Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before fertility-sparing surgery may improve pregnancy rates in early cervical cancerFertility-sparing cervical cancer treatment shows higher pregnancy rate with chemotherapy first

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider NACT before fertility-sparing surgery may improve pregnancy rates, but oncologic safety requires prospective validation.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined recurrence and pregnancy outcomes in 1,453 women with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 IB2-IIA1; tumours ≥2 cm). It compared neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery (NACT+FSS) to upfront fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). The pooled pregnancy rate was 31% for NACT+FSS versus 8% for upfront FSS (p=0.002). The pooled recurrence rate was 13% for NACT+FSS and 10% for upfront FSS (p=0.415), indicating no statistically significant difference in recurrence outcomes between the approaches.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the analysis. The included studies generally exhibited a moderate-to-high risk of bias, and the authors note that prospective validation of these findings is necessary. The comparison between groups was indirect, and the evidence is based on observational studies, which can show association but not prove causation.

In practice, these findings suggest that NACT+FSS could be considered as a personalized option to extend fertility-sparing indications in select patients, given the observed association with higher pregnancy rates without a statistically significant increase in recurrence. However, clinicians should interpret these results cautiously due to the study limitations and the need for prospective, controlled trials to confirm oncologic safety and long-term outcomes.

Researchers reviewed existing studies to compare two treatment paths for women with early-stage cervical cancer who wish to have children in the future. They looked at women with tumors at least 2 centimeters in size. One approach was to have fertility-sparing surgery right away. The other was to receive chemotherapy first to shrink the tumor, followed by the same type of surgery.

The analysis combined data from 1,453 women across multiple studies. It found that the pregnancy rate was higher for women who had chemotherapy before surgery (31%) compared to those who had surgery alone (8%). The rates of cancer coming back were 13% for the chemotherapy-first group and 10% for the surgery-only group, a difference that was not statistically significant.

The main reason to be careful with these results is that they come from observational studies, not controlled clinical trials. The studies included had a moderate-to-high risk of bias, meaning their designs might have influenced the findings. The researchers note that prospective validation is still needed.

Readers should understand that this review suggests a potential benefit for pregnancy outcomes when chemotherapy is used before fertility-sparing surgery, without a clear increase in recurrence risk in this analysis. However, this is not yet a proven standard. Women considering these options should discuss the latest evidence and their personal situation with their oncology team.

What this means for you:
Review suggests chemotherapy before fertility-sparing surgery may improve pregnancy chances, but more rigorous studies are needed to confirm.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Early-stage cervical cancer tumours ≥2 cm present a dilemma for fertility preservation, as guidelines generally discourage fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) due to oncologic risks. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by FSS has emerged as an alternative to downstage tumours. This study evaluated recurrence and pregnancy outcomes of NACT + FSS versus upfront FSS. METHODS: A PROSPERO-registered (CRD42024605906) meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane (updated Feb 26, 2025). Eligible studies included women with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 IB2-IIA1; ≥2 cm) undergoing upfront FSS or NACT + FSS. Pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Nineteen observational studies (n = 1453) were analysed. Indirect comparison indicated significantly higher pooled pregnancy rate for NACT + FSS (31%; 95% CI: 23-41%) compared to upfront FSS (8%; CI: 1-43%; p = 0.002). Pooled recurrence rate was statistically similar: 10% (CI: 5-20%) for upfront FSS and 13% (CI: 9-20%) for NACT + FSS (p = 0.415). Studies generally exhibited a moderate-to-high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: NACT followed by FSS appears to enhance fertility outcomes without increasing oncologic risk compared to upfront FSS in patients with tumours ≥2 cm. These findings support the personalized extension of fertility-sparing indications, though prospective validation remains necessary.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.