Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Prenatal depression screening uptake increased but diverged across language groups from 2019 to 2024

Prenatal depression screening uptake increased but diverged across language groups from 2019 to 2024
Photo by rmb sapardi / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note that prenatal depression screening uptake increased but diverged across language groups from 2019 to 2024.

A retrospective cohort study analyzed 99,526 pregnancies (82,632 individuals) at or beyond 20 weeks gestation in a large U.S. Midwest healthcare system from 2019 to 2024. The study examined screening uptake for prenatal depression across three preferred language groups: English, Spanish, and Another Language. In 2019, screening probabilities were similar across groups: English 0.50, Spanish 0.48, and Another Language 0.50.

By 2024, screening probabilities had increased substantially but diverged across language groups: English 0.81, Spanish 0.66, and Another Language 0.71. The difference in screening uptake increases across language groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). The study did not report specific safety or tolerability data related to screening.

Key limitations include the observational design, which cannot establish causality, and the single healthcare system setting, which may limit generalizability. The study did not report absolute numbers of screened patients or detailed demographic characteristics beyond language preference. No information was provided about funding sources or author conflicts of interest.

For clinical practice, these findings suggest that while overall screening for prenatal depression has increased, disparities persist based on language preference. Unequal screening uptake may systematically under-identify prenatal depression among patients with non-English language preference, potentially affecting equitable access to psychiatric care. Clinicians should be aware of these disparities in their screening practices.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Prenatal depression is a substantial contributor to maternal morbidity, and screening is an entry point to psychiatric assessment and treatment during pregnancy. Following updated guidelines and quality metrics for prenatal depression screening, we evaluated whether screening uptake differed by preferred language within a large U.S. healthcare system. We used electronic health record data to identify a retrospective cohort of deliveries at or beyond 20 weeks gestation in 2019-2024. We used logistic regression with a language-year interaction to estimate the adjusted marginal probabilities of screening by language preference. Among 99,526 pregnancies (82,632 individuals), screening increased substantially over time but increases differed across language groups (p<0.001). In 2019, screening probabilities were similar (English 0.50; Spanish 0.48; Another Language 0.50). By 2024, probabilities diverged (English 0.81; Spanish 0.66; Another Language 0.71). Unequal screening uptake can systematically under-identify prenatal depression among patients with non-English language preference, with implications for equitable access to psychiatric care.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.