Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Augmented reality training improves student competency and performance in simulated vaginal birth careAugmented Reality Training Improves Student Performance in Birth Care

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider augmented reality as a method to improve student competency in simulated vaginal birth care training.

This study investigated the efficacy of augmented reality (AR) based training versus traditional text and video materials for medical and midwifery students. The primary focus was on the achievement of competency thresholds and performance during simulated vaginal birth care. The study compared these two educational modalities to determine which method better prepared students for clinical simulations.

The results indicated that students who utilized augmented reality training achieved higher mean scores in clinical assessments and performed better on critical tasks compared to those in the traditional group. Additionally, a higher proportion of students in the augmented reality group reached the required competency thresholds. These findings suggest that interactive technology may provide a more effective pedagogical tool for complex clinical skills.

Authors noted that while the technology was effective, students identified opportunities to improve the realism of the augmented reality experience. A primary limitation is that the study evaluated student performance in a simulated environment rather than clinical outcomes in live patients. Therefore, while the results are promising for medical education, the transition to real-world clinical practice requires further investigation.

A study involving 401 medical and midwifery students in Chile and Colombia compared two ways of preparing for vaginal birth care. One group used augmented reality (AR) training, while the other group used traditional text and video materials. The study looked at how well students performed in a simulated environment.

Students who used the augmented reality training performed better in several areas. They scored higher on average on skill assessments and showed better performance on critical tasks. Additionally, more students in the augmented reality group reached the minimum competency threshold compared to those who used traditional materials.

While the results are promising for training students, it is important to note that this study focused on simulated scenarios. The research measured how students performed in a simulation, not on actual patients in a clinical setting. Students also noted that the technology could be improved to feel more realistic. This finding suggests that augmented reality could be a helpful tool for teaching medical students specific skills.

What this means for you:
Augmented reality training helped students achieve higher scores and better task performance in birth care simulations.

Common questions

How did augmented reality affect student scores?

Students who used augmented reality training achieved higher mean scores on skill assessments compared to those who used traditional text and video materials. Specifically, the augmented reality group scored 11.9 compared to 10.6 in the traditional group. These results were statistically significant, showing a clear advantage for the augmented reality method in the simulation.

Did the training help students reach competency goals?

Yes, the study found that a higher proportion of students reached the minimum competency threshold when using augmented reality. In the augmented reality group, 12.8% of students reached the threshold, while only 6.2% of students in the traditional group did so. This suggests the technology helps students meet specific training goals.

Does this mean the training is better for real patients?

The study focused on student performance in a simulated environment, not on actual clinical outcomes for real patients. While the augmented reality training showed better results in the simulation, it is not a direct measure of clinical success in a hospital. It is a tool for training students to improve their skills.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Simulation is essential for teaching procedural skills in obstetrics, yet access to high-fidelity simulators remains limited. Augmented reality (AR) offers an innovative and scalable way to enhance pre-simulation learning. This study evaluated whether AR-based training improves student performance in simulated vaginal births compared with traditional text- and video-based preparation. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial with blinded evaluators involving 401 undergraduate medical and midwifery students from two universities (Chile and Colombia). Participants were assigned to AR-based training (experimental group) or conventional preparation (control group). All students completed high-fidelity childbirth simulations assessed using a validated Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) checklist. The primary outcome was achievement of the minimum competency threshold; secondary outcomes included mean DOPS scores, critical task performance, and student satisfaction. RESULTS: Students trained with AR achieved significantly higher DOPS scores (11.9 ± 0.14 vs 10.6 ± 0.15; < .001) and greater critical task completion (3.6 ± 0.07 vs 3.3 ± 0.07; < .001) than controls. The proportion reaching the competency threshold doubled in the AR group (12.8% vs 6.2%; RR 2.23; 95% CI 1.07-4.01; < .05). Both groups reported high satisfaction, though AR users noted opportunities to improve realism. DISCUSSION: AR-based pre-simulation training enhances performance and competency attainment in simulated vaginal birth care. This scalable and cost-effective approach complements traditional simulation, supporting competency-based medical education while broadening access to high-quality procedural training in obstetrics.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.