Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Digital competencies differ between German and Indian healthcare students in cross-sectional surveyDigital skills vary between German and Indian healthcare students

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that self-reported digital competencies vary by country in healthcare students, requiring tailored education strategies.

This observational cross-sectional study surveyed 305 healthcare and nursing students in Germany (n=49) and India (n=256) via an online questionnaire. The primary outcome was self-assessed digital competencies using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire, with secondary outcomes including strategies for searching for reliable information online.

The German cohort reported higher competencies in data processing and evaluation, with a significant difference in 1 of 3 items. No significant differences were found in communication/collaboration (0 of 2 items). The Indian cohort scored higher in digital content creation (significant differences in 3 of 3 items), security (significant differences in 2 of 3 items), and problem-solving (significant differences in 1 of 4 items). For search strategies, the German cohort showed structured, academically oriented approaches, while the Indian cohort showed greater heterogeneity.

Safety and tolerability were not reported, as this was a survey study. Key limitations include the small German sample size (n=49) compared to the Indian sample (n=256), self-assessed (subjective) measures, cross-sectional design that cannot establish causality, potential selection bias from online survey, and limited generalizability due to single institutional samples.

Practice relevance underscores the need for context-sensitive digital education strategies that combine structured research competencies with practical digital literacy to prepare students for increasingly digitalized healthcare environments in both countries. Causality cannot be inferred, and results are not validated against objective performance measures.

A survey looked at digital skills among healthcare and nursing students in Germany and India. Researchers asked 305 students (49 from Germany, 256 from India) to rate their own abilities in areas like data processing, communication, content creation, security, and problem-solving using an online questionnaire.

German students reported higher skills in evaluating and processing data, while Indian students scored higher in creating digital content, security practices, and some problem-solving areas. When searching for reliable information online, German students tended to use more structured, academic approaches, while Indian students showed more varied strategies.

This was a small, observational study where students rated their own skills, which means the findings are subjective and can't prove what causes these differences. The German sample was particularly small compared to the Indian group. The results only apply to students at these specific institutions and shouldn't be generalized to all students in either country.

The study suggests that digital education for healthcare students might need different approaches in different contexts, but more research with objective measures would be needed to confirm these patterns.

What this means for you:
Small survey shows healthcare students in Germany and India report different digital skill strengths.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The digital transformation in healthcare requires future professionals to have solid digital skills. Despite the global relevance of digital skills, little is known about how these skills differ in countries with different healthcare and education systems. This study compares the self-assessed digital skills of two institutional samples of healthcare and nursing students in Germany and India using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire and examines the correlation between perceived competence and the strategies reported for searching for information. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in April and May 2025 among 49 students in Germany and 256 students in India. Digital competences were assessed using the DigKomp 2.2 questionnaire, which covers all five dimensions of the DigComp framework. An open-ended question was used to record the students’ strategies for searching for reliable information on the internet. The quantitative data were analyzed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, the Levene test, and the t-test for two independent samples. Both cohorts showed acceptable to high internal consistency across all DigKomp 2.2 dimensions. Students in the German cohort reported higher competencies in data processing and evaluation and communication/collaboration, while students from the Indian cohort scored higher in digital content creation, security and problem solving. The exploratory bivariate analysis between the Indian and German samples revealed significant differences in 7 out of 15 items, specifically within the dimensions of digital content creation (3/3 items), Security (2/3 items), data processing & evaluation (1/3 items), and problem solving (1/4 items), whereas no significant differences were found in communication/cooperation (0/2 items). Qualitative responses revealed structured and academically oriented search strategies among German cohort. Indian responses showed greater heterogeneity. Digital competence development varies substantially between the two institutional samples, reflecting differences in educational structures, access to digital technologies and national digitalization trajectories. While German students demonstrate strong academically grounded competencies, Indian students exhibit strengths in practical and applied digital competence. These findings underscore the need for context-sensitive digital education strategies that combine structured research competencies with practical digital literacy to prepare students for increasingly digitalized healthcare environments in both countries.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.