Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Sentinel Node Biopsy Associated with Reduced Melanoma Mortality and Recurrence in Meta-Analysis

Sentinel Node Biopsy Associated with Reduced Melanoma Mortality and Recurrence in Meta-Analysis
Photo by National Cancer Institute / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that observational data associate SNB with reduced melanoma mortality and recurrence, but 10-year survival benefit was not significant.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 observational studies, including 40,287 adults with cutaneous melanoma, compared outcomes for patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy (SNB) versus those who did not. The primary outcome was death from melanoma.

The adjusted risk of death from melanoma was significantly reduced in the SNB group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92, p<0.0001). The 5-year risk of death was also significantly reduced (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78-0.90, p<0.0001). However, the 10-year risk of death was not statistically significant (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-1.06; p=0.17). The adjusted risk of recurrence was significantly reduced with SNB (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.76, p<0.0001). Absolute numbers for these outcomes were not reported.

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The authors note low heterogeneity for the primary outcome (I² 16%) and recurrence (I² 23%), but greater heterogeneity for the 10-year outcome (I² 41%). Sensitivity analyses indicated the primary result was robust. The authors interpret the findings as consistent with the only published randomized trial and indicative of true survival and recurrence benefits from SNB. However, as this is a meta-analysis of observational studies, the evidence demonstrates association, not proven causation. Key study limitations were not reported.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 287
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up216.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: It is unproven whether sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for people with cutaneous melanoma improves survival. This study aimed to establish whether there is a reduction in the risk of death from melanoma after SNB. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis involved searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov (up to Jan 8, 2025) using terms for melanoma, SNB, and survival. Studies were included if they reported survival in adults (ie, aged ≥18 years) with melanoma who underwent SNB relative to those who did not, and excluded studies without these data, because survival risk in people with melanoma could not be calculated. Duplicate title review (by GJW and CAG) and data extraction (by GJW and MBW) were performed. The primary outcome was death from melanoma. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa and Cochrane Collaboration tools. This study was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD4203494674). FINDINGS: From 1560 screened records, 60 studies were eligible for analysis. After the exclusion of one study with high selection bias meta-analysis, 13 studies (40 287 participants) reporting an adjusted risk were analysed and showed a significantly reduced risk of death from melanoma for people who underwent SNB: hazard ratio (HR) 0·86 (95% CI 0·81-0·92, p<0·0001), with low heterogeneity (I 16%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed that this result was not dependent on any single study or on the use of systemic therapy. A similar result was obtained from the analysis of the five studies (27 540 participants) that reported 5-year risk of death from melanoma: HR 0·84 (95% CI 0·78-0·90, p<0·0001) with low heterogeneity (I 15%). A 10-year risk of death from melanoma was reported in two studies with three estimates: 0·87 (0·71-1·06; p=0·17) and with greater heterogeneity (I 41%). From nine studies (11 625 participants) reporting an adjusted risk of recurrence, the HR was 0·71 (95% CI 0·66-0·76, p<0·0001) with low heterogeneity (I 23%). INTERPRETATION: This meta-analysis showed that people with melanoma who underwent SNB had a significantly reduced risk of death from melanoma and recurrence compared with those who did not. These findings are consistent with the only published randomised controlled trial and were robust on sensitivity analyses, indicating that SNB confers true survival and recurrence benefits. FUNDING: None.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.