Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with angiogenesis inhibitors increases pathological complete response rates in triple-negative breast cancerBevacizumab May Improve Pathological Response in Early Breast Cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that adding angiogenesis inhibitors to NACT significantly improves pCR rates specifically in triple-negative breast cancer.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) containing angiogenesis inhibitors compared to NACT without these inhibitors in 8,069 patients across 10 RCTs. The primary finding was a significant increase in pathological complete response (pCR) rates when angiogenesis inhibitors were included in the NACT regimen.

Specifically, pCR rates increased from 22.59% to 29.88% overall. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), pCR rates significantly elevated from 32.42% to 42.46%. However, no statistically significant improvement in pCR was observed for hormone receptor-positive patients. Secondary outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), showed no significant differences between the treatment groups.

The authors noted a lack of clear biomarkers to predict treatment efficacy as a primary limitation. While the combination of bevacizumab with NACT may improve pCR rates particularly in TNBC, there is currently no consensus on whether these interventions lead to improved overall survival. Clinical application should consider the specific breast cancer subtype when evaluating potential benefits from angiogenesis inhibitors.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap regarding the role of angiogenesis inhibitors in early-stage breast cancer treatment. While previous evidence highlights the efficacy of tamoxifen for hormone receptor-positive patients and various herbal decoctions for managing chemotherapy side effects, this study specifically focuses on neoadjuvant settings. It confirms that while bevacizumab may improve pCR rates in triple-negative cases, it does not currently show a significant impact on overall survival or disease-free survival.

Researchers analyzed data from 8,069 patients with early-stage breast cancer across 10 clinical trials. They compared patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with an angiogenesis inhibitor, such as bevacizumab, against those receiving chemotherapy alone. The goal was to see if adding the inhibitor improved the pathological response rate (pCR), which measures how much of the tumor is replaced by normal tissue before surgery.

The study found that patients who received both chemotherapy and the angiogenesis inhibitor had significantly higher pCR rates compared to those who only received chemotherapy. This improvement was especially notable in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. However, for patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, no significant difference in response rates was found between the two groups.

While the treatment showed promise in improving local tumor response, the study did not find a significant difference in overall survival or disease-free survival for any group. Because there are currently no clear biomarkers to predict which patients will benefit most from this specific combination, results may vary. Patients should talk to their doctors about how these findings might apply to their specific type of cancer.

What this means for you:
Adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy may improve tumor response rates in some early-stage breast cancers.

Common questions

Does this treatment help all types of breast cancer?

The study found that adding the angiogenesis inhibitor significantly increased response rates for patients with triple-negative breast cancer. However, it did not show a statistically significant improvement for patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Does this treatment help patients live longer?

While the addition of an angiogenesis inhibitor improved the pathological response rate in some cases, the study found no significant differences in overall survival or disease-free survival between the two groups.

What is a pathological response rate?

A pathological response rate (pCR) measures how much of the tumor is replaced by normal tissue after chemotherapy but before surgery. The study found these rates were significantly higher when bevacizumab was added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundBreast cancer, as a prevalent malignant tumor among women worldwide, has its malignant progression closely linked to angiogenesis mechanisms. Research indicates that combining anti-angiogenic drugs can promote tumor vascular normalization, thereby improving the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents and reversing the drug-resistant microenvironment. Some clinical studies have confirmed that such combination regimens can enhance pathological response rates (pCR). This paper aims to systematically evaluate the clinical value of angiogenesis inhibitors in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for breast cancer and provide evidence-based guidance to optimize treatment strategies.MethodsWe systematically searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases up to July 16, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing angiogenesis inhibitor-based NACT regimens with angiogenesis inhibitor-free regimens in breast cancer patients. Using random effects models, we calculated pooled odds ratios and hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for pCR, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs).ResultsThis analysis included 10 RCTs (8,069 patients). The results showed that NACT containing angiogenesis inhibitors significantly increased the pCR rate (22.59% vs. 29.88%). Subgroup analysis indicated no statistically significant improvement in pCR among hormone receptor-positive patients, whereas in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the pCR rate was significantly elevated (32.42% vs. 42.46%). Regarding survival outcomes, no significant differences were observed in either DFS or OS.ConclusionsThe combination of bevacizumab with NACT can improve the pCR rate, with this effect being particularly pronounced in TNBC. However, current research has not yet reached a consensus on whether it can improve OS, and there remains a lack of clear biomarkers for predicting treatment efficacy.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420261411787.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.