Meta-analysis of intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel versus BCG in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
This systematic review and meta-analysis included 1,634 patients with intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The study compared intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel combination therapy against BCG therapy in BCG-naïve patients. Follow-up was 24.0 months.
For high-risk BCG-naïve NMIBC, 24-month recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 78% (95% CI 70%-84%) with gemcitabine/docetaxel. In BCG-treated or unresponsive NMIBC, 24-month RFS was 41% (95% CI 34%-47%). Progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months was 97% (95% CI 69%-100%) in high-risk BCG-naïve patients and 85% (95% CI 63%-95%) in BCG-treated patients.
In BCG-naïve intermediate to very-high-risk NMIBC, there was no significant difference in RFS between gemcitabine/docetaxel and BCG (hazard ratio 0.87; 95% CI 0.51-1.50). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the risk of adverse events (odds ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.21-1.60). Higher maintenance utilization was associated with significantly improved RFS at 24 months (p = .004).
Safety data were limited; specific adverse events were not reported, only the grade of serious adverse events was noted. The study phase was not reported. These findings suggest that gemcitabine/docetaxel does not significantly improve RFS compared to BCG in BCG-naïve patients, though PFS data require cautious interpretation due to wide confidence intervals.