Systematic review and meta-analysis compares intravesical gemcitabine/docetaxel versus BCG for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel versus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. The pooled analysis included 1634 patients, comprising 999 receiving gemcitabine/docetaxel and 635 receiving BCG. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival, with secondary outcomes including high-grade recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, and adverse events. The follow-up duration was 24.0 months.
In high-risk BCG-naïve patients, 24-month recurrence-free survival was 78% (95% CI: 70%-84%) for the gemcitabine/docetaxel group. In high-risk BCG-treated or unresponsive patients, the rate was 41% (95% CI: 34%-47%). Progression-free survival at 24 months was 97% (95% CI: 69%-100%) for BCG-naïve patients and 85% (95% CI: 63%-95%) for BCG-treated patients. A comparison in BCG-naïve intermediate to very-high-risk disease showed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.51-1.50).
Safety analysis revealed that Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 3.6% of gemcitabine/docetaxel cohorts. The risk of adverse events showed no significant difference between groups, with an odds ratio of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.21-1.60). The authors noted that maintenance effects were derived from between-study comparisons and should be interpreted cautiously due to heterogeneity in maintenance protocols and adherence. Funding or conflicts were not reported.