Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Low creatinine-cystatin C ratio correlates with reduced survival in cancer patients in meta-analysisCould a simple blood test ratio help predict cancer survival?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider CCR as a correlated prognostic marker in cancer, but recognize evidence is observational and non-causal.

This meta-analysis examined the prognostic value of the creatinine-cystatin C ratio (CCR) in individuals with cancer. It pooled data from 12 observational trials, encompassing a total of 4439 patients. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), with progression-free survival (PFS) as a secondary outcome. The comparator for a low CCR was not explicitly reported in the input data.

The main results showed a substantial correlation between a low CCR and reduced OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.71 (95% CI 1.49-1.96). For PFS, a strong correlation was also observed, with an HR of 1.51 (95% CI 1.29-1.77). Absolute event numbers for these outcomes were not reported. Safety and tolerability data were not available from the provided information.

Key limitations include the observational nature of the included studies, which precludes establishing causality. The specific types of cancer represented in the 4439 individuals were not reported, limiting generalizability. Other standard limitations, such as potential publication bias or heterogeneity, were not detailed in the input. Funding sources and author conflicts of interest were also not reported.

In practice, these findings suggest the CCR may be a promising and affordable prognostic biomarker for cancer patients. However, clinicians should interpret this as a correlation observed in aggregated retrospective data. Its utility for guiding specific clinical decisions in individual patients or cancer subtypes remains uncertain and requires prospective validation.

When facing cancer, patients and doctors want every possible clue about what lies ahead. A new analysis of existing research suggests a simple, affordable blood test might offer one such clue. The test looks at the ratio of two common substances measured in blood—creatinine and cystatin C—which are markers of kidney function. A low ratio, called CCR, was linked to shorter survival times in people with cancer.

The researchers pooled data from 12 different studies involving 4,439 individuals with cancer. They found that people with a low CCR had a higher risk of dying from any cause during the study period. The strength of this link was notable, with a 71% higher risk for overall survival and a 51% higher risk for the cancer progressing or the patient dying. However, the analysis didn't report the actual number of people who died or how long the studies followed patients.

It's crucial to understand what this finding means—and what it doesn't. This is a correlation, meaning the two things—a low CCR and shorter survival—were observed together. It does not prove that a low CCR causes worse outcomes. The analysis combined different types of observational studies, which can't establish cause and effect. We also don't know which specific types of cancer were involved or if there were other factors at play. The researchers call CCR a 'promising' biomarker, but more research is needed to see if it's truly useful for guiding care.

What this means for you:
A simple blood ratio is linked to cancer survival, but it's an early clue, not a proven tool.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the creatinine-cystatin C ratio (CCR) in individuals with cancer has been investigated in numerous studies, but the findings vary. To accurately identify the prognostic value of CCR in individuals with cancer, we conducted this meta-analysis. METHODS: Pertinent studies were retrieved across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane from their establishment to June 8, 2024. Additional searches were conducted until November 16, 2024. In this study, the calculation of the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) allowed us to determine the prognostic value of CCR in individuals with cancer. Additionally, Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was employed for quality evaluation, Cochrane I statistic for heterogeneity assessment, funnel plots for publication bias evaluation, and Egger test for quantitative identification. Significant publication bias is indicated by a P < 0.05. A software called STATA 15.1 was utilized for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Initially, 2001 articles were retrieved in total, and this study comprised twelve trials with 4439 individuals with cancer overall. Our findings demonstrated a substantial correlation between a low CCR and a reduced overall survival (OS) in individuals with cancer (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.49-1.96). Similarly, a strong correlation between CCR and progression-free survival (PFS) CCR was also noted (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29-1.77). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis revealed that in individuals with cancer, a low CCR was strongly correlated with OS and PFS. Therefore, in clinical practice, CCR may be a promising and affordable prognostic biomarker for individuals with cancer.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.