Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Preconsult digital Patient Decision Aids reduce decisional conflict before consultation in breast cancer patientsDigital tools may lower decision stress for breast cancer patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that preconsult digital PtDAs may reduce decisional conflict before consultation in breast cancer patients.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 204 patients with breast cancer eligible for adjuvant treatment to evaluate the impact of a digital preconsult Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) compared to an identical paper-based PtDA provided during the consultation.

The primary outcome, patient-reported SDM Process_4, was lower in the preconsult group but did not reach statistical significance (P =.154). However, several secondary outcomes showed significant differences. The preconsult group demonstrated significantly lower decisional conflict before consultation (P =.002) and lower preparation for decision-making scores (P =.004).

In contrast, the in-consult paper-based PtDA group was associated with higher observer-rated SDM scores: OPTION5 (P =.019) and OPTION12 (P =.005). Other metrics, including SDM-Q, CollaboRATE, and consultation duration, showed no significant differences between the two groups. No safety data or adverse events were reported.

A key limitation is the lack of consistency in shared decision-making metrics across tools. While digital PtDAs may reduce decisional conflict before a consultation, structured integration into the actual encounter may be necessary to support observable shared decision-making processes.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap regarding the timing and medium of decision aids in breast cancer care. While previous coverage focused on clinical outcomes like tamoxifen for recurrence or dose-dense chemotherapy for hazard reduction, this study focuses on the process of shared decision-making (SDM). It specifically explores how digital tools versus paper-based tools influence patient preparation and decisional conflict prior to consultation.

Making big decisions about breast cancer treatment is heavy work. Patients often feel overwhelmed by the options, which can lead to a lot of mental stress and uncertainty before they even sit down in a doctor's office. Researchers wanted to see if a digital tool could help clear that mental fog.

The study looked at 204 patients who were preparing for treatment. One group used a digital decision aid before their appointment, while the other group received a paper-based version during their consultation. The results showed that those using the digital tool felt significantly less conflict about their decisions before they met with their doctors.

While the digital tool helped lower initial stress, the study also found that the paper-based method led to higher scores for shared decision making as observed by others. Because of these mixed results, experts suggest that while digital tools are great for preparation, we may need better ways to integrate them into the actual doctor visit to ensure patients feel fully supported throughout the whole process.

What this means for you:
Digital tools can reduce a patient's feeling of conflict before they meet with their doctor about treatment.

Common questions

How does a digital tool help with my treatment choice?

The study found that using a digital decision aid before a consultation significantly lowered decisional conflict. This means patients felt less conflicted about their choices before meeting with their doctors, helping them feel more prepared for the conversation.

Is it better to use a digital tool or a paper form?

The results were mixed. While the digital tool helped reduce feelings of conflict before the visit, the paper-based version during the consultation was associated with higher scores for shared decision making as observed by others.

Will using a digital tool change how long my doctor's appointment lasts?

No. The study found no significant difference in the duration of the consultation between patients who used the digital pre-consultation tool and those who received paper-based information during their visit.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: For people with breast cancer facing adjuvant treatment decisions, it is unclear whether providing a patient decision aid (PtDA) before versus during the consultation leads to greater involvement in shared decision-making (SDM). The overall aim was to evaluate the effect of a digital preconsult PtDA compared with an identical in-consult paper-based PtDA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, patients with breast cancer eligible for adjuvant treatment were randomized to a digital PtDA before consultation or a paper-based PtDA during consultation. Primary outcome was patient-reported SDM Process_4. Secondary outcomes included observer-rated SDM (OPTION5/12), patient- and physician-reported SDM-Q, decisional conflict, CollaboRATE, preparation for decision-making, and consultation duration. Between-group differences were estimated using linear regression; post-consultation outcomes were analyzed with standard errors clustered at the physician level. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were randomized. Mean SDM Process_4 score was lower in the preconsult group, but not significant (P = .154). Observer-rated SDM was significantly higher in the in-consult group (OPTION5; P = .019; OPTION12: P = .005). The preconsult group reported lower decisional conflict before the consultation (P = .002) and lower preparation for decision-making (P = .004). No significant between-group differences were observed for post-consultation decisional conflict, SDM-Q, CollaboRATE, or consultation duration. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported SDM did not differ significantly between groups, but the paper-based in-consult PtDA was associated with higher observer-rated SDM. Digital PtDAs may reduce decisional conflict before consultation, but structured integration into the encounter may be needed to support observable SDM.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.