This cross-sectional study examined 3,141 U.S. counties stratified within Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic populations. The analysis focused on county-level socio-behavioral determinants of health, utilizing a composite index comprising seven domains including community solidarity, education, health literacy, quality of care, housing, economic livelihoods, lifestyle behaviors, and touchpoints with care. The primary outcome assessed race- and ethnicity-specific, age-adjusted breast and prostate cancer mortality rates from 2018 to 2022.
Results indicated a positive association between higher socio-behavioral risk and increased mortality for both breast and prostate cancers. The risk increased monotonically across mortality tertiles for all groups. Notably, the largest within-group increases in risk were observed among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black women. High-mortality Hispanic counties exhibited pronounced risk specifically in lifestyle behaviors, economic livelihoods, and touchpoints with care.
No adverse events or discontinuations were reported as this was an observational analysis of mortality data rather than a clinical trial. Key limitations include the reliance on population averages or single composite measures, which can obscure high-need communities within broader groups. Furthermore, how socio-behavioral determinants vary within groups across local gradients of cancer mortality remains incompletely characterized.
The study concludes that linking population-specific, domain-level socio-behavioral profiles to cancer mortality may support more precise and equity-oriented cancer control strategies than reliance on group averages or composite indices. However, causality was not explicitly claimed, and the observational nature of the data limits definitive causal inference.
View Original Abstract ↓
Importance Persistent racial and ethnic disparities in breast and prostate cancer mortality are well documented. Most prior studies emphasize between-group differences and rely on population averages or single composite measures of social disadvantage, which can obscure high-need communities within groups. How socio-behavioral determinants of health vary within groups across local gradients of cancer mortality remains incompletely characterized. A framework that combines race- and cancer-specific mortality with local, domain-level socio-behavioral profiles may help identify where burden is greatest and which specific barriers warrant prioritization. Objective To determine how socio-behavioral risk relates to breast and prostate cancer mortality within racial and ethnic groups and to characterize domain-specific behavioral profiles across low-, moderate- and high-mortality counties to inform targeted, equity-oriented cancer control strategies. Design Cross-sectional study of U.S. counties. Setting United States, county-level analysis. Participants 3,141 U.S. counties, stratified within Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic populations. Exposures County-level socio-behavioral determinants of health measured using a composite index comprising seven domains: community solidarity; education, health literacy, and digital connectivity; quality of care; housing and environmental risk; economic livelihoods; lifestyle behaviors; and touchpoints with care. Main outcomes and measures Race/ethnicity-specific, age-adjusted breast and prostate cancer mortality rates (2018-2022) and county-level socio-behavioral risk scores. Counties were grouped into mortality tertiles within each race/ethnicity-by-cancer-stratum. Results Across groups, higher socio-behavioral risk was associated with higher breast and prostate cancer mortality. For breast cancer, socio-behavioral risk increased monotonically across mortality tertiles for all groups, with the largest within-group increases among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black women. For prostate cancer, risk generally increased across mortality tertiles for all groups. Although Hispanic populations had lower population-average mortality, high-mortality Hispanic counties exhibited pronounced risk in lifestyle behaviors, economic livelihoods, and touchpoints with care. Domain patterns associated with high mortality varied by race, ethnicity, and cancer type, with touchpoints with care and economic livelihoods consistently prominent. Conclusions and relevance Within-group heterogeneity in socio-behavioral risk is substantial across U.S. counties. Linking population-specific, domain-level socio-behavioral profiles to cancer mortality may support more precise and equity-oriented cancer control strategies than reliance on group averages or composite indices.