Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective cohort study of 217 surgically treated borderline ovarian tumors in Southern Sweden compares conservative versus complete staging surgery.

Retrospective cohort study of 217 surgically treated borderline ovarian tumors in Southern Sweden co…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider conservative surgery for BOT to balance oncologic safety and morbidity, noting age predicts survival.

This retrospective, population-based cohort review analyzed data from 217 surgically treated patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) in Southern Sweden. The study compared conservative surgery against complete staging surgery to evaluate impacts on relapse risk, overall survival, and progression-free survival over a 5-year follow-up period. Nine patients with synchronous malignancy were excluded from survival analyses.

Regarding recurrence, the study observed a more frequent occurrence after conservative surgery compared to complete surgery, with rates of 12.1% versus 3.2%, respectively. However, the p-value for this comparison was not reported. Overall survival at the end of follow-up was 100% for patients aged 40 and under, 95.3% for those aged 41–50, 95.3% for those aged 51–65, and 92.5% for those over 65. A log-rank p-value of 0.02 indicated age-dependent differences in overall survival.

Progression-free survival differed by age in the overall cohort and among patients receiving complete surgery, but not in those receiving conservative surgery. Specifically, p-values were 0.002 for the overall cohort, 0.001 for the complete surgery group, and 0.721 for the conservative surgery group. Among patients receiving complete surgery, overall survival did not differ significantly across age categories (p=0.287). Age at the first operation was identified as an independent predictor of survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.068 (95% CI 1.018–1.119, p=0.007), indicating increased risk with older age.

No adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability data were reported. The study limitations include the exclusion of patients with synchronous malignancy. These findings suggest that conservative surgery does not compromise long-term outcomes and can be considered across age categories to balance oncologic safety with the goal of reducing surgical morbidity, supporting individualized treatment planning.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundThe need for complete staging surgery including hysterectomy for all age patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) is debatable, considering fertility in younger patients and potential higher morbidity in older patients. We aimed to investigate the relapse risk and overall survival in a cohort including patients who underwent conservative surgery (organ-preserving procedures) to minimize complications, independent of fertility considerations.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, population-based review of 217 surgically treated BOT patients in Southern Sweden (2017–2022). Patients were stratified by age (≤40, 41–50, 51–65, >65 years) and surgical approach (conservative vs complete staging). Outcomes included recurrence, 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and OS at end-of-follow-up. Kaplan–Meier analyses with log-rank tests evaluated survival differences; univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models identified independent predictors.ResultsOf 217 patients, 9 had a synchronous malignancy and were excluded from the survival analyses. 36 underwent conservative surgery, 167 complete staging surgery and 5 bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with uterus preservation. Recurrence was more frequent after conservative surgery (12.1%) than complete surgery (3.2%) but did not reach statistical significance. Five-year OS was 100% for patients ≤40 and 41–50 years, 95.3% for those 51–65 years and 92.5% for >65 years (log-rank p=0.02). PFS differed by age in the overall cohort (p=0.002) and among complete surgery patients (p=0.001), but not in conservative surgery patients (p=0.721). OS did not differ significantly among complete surgery patients across age categories (p=0.287). In multivariate Cox regression, age at first operation was the only independent predictor of survival (HR = 1.068, 95% CI 1.018–1.119, p=0.007).ConclusionAge at first operation independently predicts survival in BOT. Young age at first surgery was associated with a higher risk of relapse, regardless the type of surgery, whereas older age was associated with an increased risk of death. Conservative surgery does not compromise long-term outcomes and can be considered across age categories to balance oncologic safety with the goal of reducing surgical morbidity, supporting individualized treatment planning.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.