Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab yields 28-month survival in BRAF wild-type anaplastic thyroid cancerMan With Rare Thyroid Cancer Alive at 28 Months

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret as hypothesis-generating only; single case cannot guide ATC practice.

This is a single case report of a 45-year-old man with metastatic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (pT3bN1a, Stage IVC) treated with lenvatinib 20 mg/day plus pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The report describes survival and disease control over 28 months of follow-up.

The patient remained alive at 28 months with sustained disease control and no imaging evidence of progression or new lesions. The authors note that the tumor was BRAF wild-type with high PD-L1 expression. No comparator was reported, and no effect size or statistical testing was provided.

Safety findings included progressive wound deterioration and skin adhesion at a prior drain site. Serious adverse events and discontinuations were not reported, and tolerability was not characterized.

The authors acknowledge that this is a single case report, which limits any inference about durability of response in the general ATC population or the predictive value of PD-L1 for all ATC patients. They also highlight the importance of multidisciplinary team coordination during surgical complications.

Given the design, these observations cannot establish causality or efficacy. They may inform hypothesis generation and multidisciplinary management discussions, but they do not support changing practice for anaplastic thyroid carcinoma broadly.

How this fits prior evidence

Prior coverage has addressed immunotherapy cost-effectiveness across cancer types, including that neoadjuvant pembrolizumab is not cost-effective in some settings, and that MMR status can guide high-value immunotherapy allocation. This case report extends the clinical experience with pembrolizumab into BRAF wild-type anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, a setting not covered in prior items. It also adds to prior coverage of lenvatinib-containing regimens, which was previously reported in hepatocellular carcinoma, though here in a different tumor type and without comparative data. The report does not confirm or contrast efficacy findings from those prior items.

This is a single case report, which is one of the earliest and weakest types of medical evidence. It describes one 45-year-old man with metastatic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, a rare and aggressive cancer. He was treated with lenvatinib (20 mg daily) and pembrolizumab (200 mg every three weeks).

After 28 months, the man was still alive. Imaging showed no evidence that his cancer had progressed and no new lesions had appeared. The report notes that his tumor did not have a BRAF mutation and had high levels of a protein called PD-L1.

The report also mentions side effects: progressive wound deterioration and skin adhesion at a prior drain site. No serious side effects or treatment discontinuations were reported.

The main reason to be careful is that this is one patient. A single case cannot show that this treatment combination works for others with this cancer, or that PD-L1 levels predict who will respond. It also cannot prove the drugs caused the disease control. Larger studies are needed. Readers should talk with their own care team about their situation.

What this means for you:
One case report cannot prove this combination works for others with this rare cancer.

Common questions

What is anaplastic thyroid carcinoma?

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma is a rare and aggressive type of thyroid cancer. The man in this report had metastatic disease, meaning it had spread. This case report describes his treatment and outcome, but it does not provide information about how common this cancer is or how other people respond to treatment.

What drugs were used in this case report?

The man received lenvatinib at 20 mg per day and pembrolizumab at 200 mg every three weeks. Lenvatinib is a targeted therapy and pembrolizumab is an immunotherapy. The report does not compare this combination to any other treatment, so it cannot say whether these drugs are better or worse than other options.

What side effects were reported?

The report mentions progressive wound deterioration and skin adhesion at a prior drain site. No serious side effects or treatment discontinuations were reported. Because this is a single case, these side effects may not reflect what others experience. Anyone with concerns about side effects should speak with their doctor.

Does this mean this treatment works for everyone with this cancer?

No. This is a single case report, which is one of the weakest types of evidence. It cannot show that the treatment combination works for other people with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, or that PD-L1 levels predict response. Larger studies are needed before any general conclusions can be made.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is one of the most lethal human malignancies, with a median overall survival of 3 to 5 months and a 1-year survival rate below 20%; survival beyond 2 years remains distinctly uncommon, particularly in patients with metastatic disease. We report a 45-year-old man who underwent left thyroid lobectomy for a mass initially attributed to an inflammatory condition; final pathology revealed an 8.0-cm ATC (pT3bN1a, Stage IVC). Molecular profiling demonstrated BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutation-negative status, no actionable next-generation sequencing (NGS) targets, and an exceptionally high PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of 90. The postoperative course was complicated by progressive wound deterioration precluding radiotherapy. Following multidisciplinary team (MDT) consensus, lenvatinib (20 mg/day) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) was initiated on July 12, 2024; wound complications were managed through iterative surgical wound care conducted concurrently with uninterrupted systemic therapy over nine cycles. At the most recent follow-up on July 13, 2026 — 28 months after initial presentation — imaging demonstrated sustained disease control with no evidence of disease progression or newly developed lesions, and the patient remained alive under active surveillance, though with mild residual discomfort from skin adhesion at the prior drain site. This case demonstrates that durable disease control is achievable in selected patients with metastatic BRAF wild-type ATC, and highlights extreme PD-L1 expression as a potential biomarker guiding immunotherapy selection, alongside the critical importance of multidisciplinary coordination enabling treatment continuity despite significant surgical complications.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.