This systematic literature review and meta-analysis included 12 studies focusing on patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer receiving PARP inhibitor–based therapy. The primary outcome assessed was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and hematologic toxicities. The follow-up duration was not reported for this synthesis.
Analysis of the pooled data indicated that PARP inhibitors significantly improved progression-free survival compared to the comparator, which was not specifically reported in the input. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.62, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.56 to 0.68. For overall survival, a modest improvement was observed with a hazard ratio of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68–0.98). Absolute numbers for these outcomes were not reported in the source data.
Regarding safety, hematologic toxicities, particularly anemia and thrombocytopenia, were identified as the most frequently reported grade ≥3 adverse events. Data on discontinuations and overall tolerability were not reported. The study design involved variability across the included clinical studies, which may impact the generalizability of the findings.
Key limitations include uncertainty regarding the overall effectiveness and long-term outcomes of the therapy. The impact on overall survival remains uncertain based on the current evidence. While PARP inhibitors provide a significant progression-free survival benefit, particularly when used as maintenance therapy, clinicians should interpret the overall survival data with caution due to the noted uncertainties.
View Original Abstract ↓
Ovarian cancer remains one of the leading causes of gynecologic cancer mortality worldwide, largely due to late-stage diagnosis and high recurrence rates. Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes disrupt homologous recombination repair pathways, creating a therapeutic vulnerability that can be exploited by poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Although PARP inhibitors have demonstrated clinical benefits in BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, variability across clinical studies has led to uncertainty regarding their overall effectiveness and long-term outcomes.
This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of PARP inhibitor–based therapy in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer.
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies published between 2013 and 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational cohort studies evaluating PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a meta-analytic approach.
Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, including five randomized controlled trials and seven observational cohort studies. Four studies were eligible for quantitative meta-analysis. PARP inhibitor therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.56–0.68). In contrast, improvement in overall survival (OS) was modest (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68–0.98) and less consistently reported. Hematologic toxicities, particularly anemia and thrombocytopenia, were the most frequently reported grade ≥3 adverse events.
PARP inhibitors provide a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients with BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer, particularly when used as maintenance therapy. However, the impact on overall survival remains uncertain, highlighting the need for longer follow-up and further prospective studies to optimize treatment strategies and clarify long-term clinical outcomes.