TrialTalk communication method boosts clinical trial consent rates to 92.9% vs 82.4% in pilot RCT
This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the TrialTalk method, a structured communication approach for discussing cancer treatment options, which includes a verbal component and a pen-and-paper diagram outlining diagnosis, prognosis, treatments, outcomes, and impacts on daily life. The study aimed to assess oncologists' ability to learn and implement the tool and its effect on clinical trial consent and enrollment. Twenty-seven oncologists from a single academic institution were randomized to an intervention group (n=14) or a control group (n=13). Intervention group oncologists completed a single 2-hour TrialTalk training program involving didactic instruction, a simulated session with patient actors, and trainer feedback, with additional support available. Control group oncologists received no TrialTalk training. Clinical trial decisions were collected from patients seen by oncologists in both groups. Results showed intervention oncologists demonstrated fidelity with the tool after training. Patients of intervention oncologists were significantly more likely to consent to participate in clinical trials than patients of control oncologists (92.9% vs. 82.4%, p=0.04). However, actual enrollment rates after signing consent were equal in both groups (78.2% in the intervention group vs. 73.3% in the control group). The study concludes that patients meeting with TrialTalk-trained oncologists were more likely to sign consent, highlighting the decision-making conversation as a critical moment for increasing trial participation.