Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Structured exercise does not show consistent cardioprotective effects on LVEF in patients with breast cancerExercise Does Not Show Clear Heart Benefits for Breast Cancer Patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that structured exercise does not show a consistent cardioprotective effect on LVEF in breast cancer patients.

This meta-analysis evaluated the impact of structured exercise on cardiac function in 513 women with breast cancer who received anthracyclines and/or anti-HER2 therapy. The primary outcome, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), showed no between-group differences (MD 0.07; 95% CI -1.38 to 1.52). Similarly, global longitudinal strain (GLS) showed no significant difference (MD -0.10; 95% CI -0.79 to 0.58).

The authors noted several limitations, including high risk of bias in most trials and wide confidence intervals that were compatible with benefit, no effect, or harm. Additionally, biomarker data were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis, and the overall evidence is described as sparse and of low certainty.

Clinically, the available data do not confirm a consistent cardioprotective effect of exercise on LVEF or GLS. Consequently, these findings do not permit conclusions regarding clinical cardiovascular events, survival, or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in this patient population.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding the cardioprotective effects of exercise in breast cancer patients receiving anthracyclines and/or anti-HER2 therapy. While other covered topics include advancements in AI for diagnosis and radiotherapy techniques, this study specifically addresses the impact of exercise on LVEF and GLS. The findings do not confirm a consistent cardioprotective effect, and the evidence is of low certainty.

Researchers looked at how structured exercise affects heart health in women with breast cancer. These patients were receiving specific treatments, including anthracyclines and anti-HER2 therapy. The study specifically looked at heart function markers, such as the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS).

The analysis of 513 patients found no significant differences between those who did structured exercise and those who received usual care. The heart measurements remained similar between both groups. Because the data was sparse and varied across different studies, the results were not clear enough to show a definite benefit.

It is important to note that this study did not provide information on survival rates or specific heart failure events. Because the evidence is of low certainty and many of the included trials had a high risk of bias, the findings are not yet enough to change standard medical practices. Patients should talk to their doctors about how exercise fits into their specific treatment plan.

What this means for you:
Current evidence does not confirm that structured exercise improves heart function in patients receiving these treatments.

Common questions

Does exercise help heart function in breast cancer patients?

The data from this analysis did not show a consistent heart-protecting effect for patients receiving anthracyclines and anti-HER2 therapy. The heart measurements, such as the left ventricular ejection fraction, were similar between those who did structured exercise and those who received usual care.

What specific heart markers were measured?

The study looked at the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). In both cases, there were no significant differences found between the group that performed structured exercise and the group that received standard care.

Is the evidence for exercise and heart health strong?

The evidence is currently considered to be of low certainty. Many of the trials included in the analysis had a high risk of bias, and the data was too varied to provide a clear conclusion about long-term heart health or survival.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether structured exercise, compared with usual care, preserves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and cardiac biomarkers in women with breast cancer receiving anthracyclines and/or anti-HER2 therapy. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2), and certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. When clinically and methodologically comparable, effects were pooled as net differences in change (ΔEG - ΔCG) using random-effects models. The primary synthesis was restricted to the baseline-to-end-of-anthracycline-treatment window (~ 4 months). RESULTS: Seven trials (9 reports; n = 513) were included. Most trials had some concerns or high risk of bias. Quantitative synthesis was feasible in only two trials. No between-group differences were observed for LVEF (MD 0.07, 95% CI - 1.38 to 1.52; I = 28.2%) or GLS (MD - 0.10, 95% CI - 0.79 to 0.58; I = 0%). Confidence intervals were wide and compatible with benefit, no effect, or harm. Biomarker data were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. Comparative clinical cardiovascular-event and survival outcomes and formal assessments of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) were not reported. CONCLUSION: Current randomized evidence is sparse, heterogeneous, and of low certainty. Available data do not confirm a consistent cardioprotective effect of exercise on LVEF or GLS and do not permit conclusions about clinical cardiovascular events, survival, or HFpEF.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.