Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Comprehensive geriatric assessment modifies treatment plans and associates with survival in older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies

Comprehensive geriatric assessment modifies treatment plans and associates with survival in older ad…
Photo by Age Cymru / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider integrating CGA into preoperative workflows for older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies to support individualized decision-making.

This retrospective cohort study included 273 adults aged ≥65 years referred for preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) within a dedicated geriatric surgery clinic at a large academic center. The population consisted of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The primary outcomes assessed were modification of the initial treatment plan and overall survival. No comparator group was reported in the study design.

Regarding the modification of the initial treatment plan, 21% of patients overall experienced a change. When stratified by frailty severity, modification rates were 10% for non-frail patients, 31% for those with mild to moderate frailty, and 65% for those with severe frailty. The study found that CGA-derived recommendations were independently associated with overall survival. Specific effect sizes, absolute numbers for survival, or p-values were not reported in the provided data.

Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, or discontinuations, were not reported. A key limitation noted is that the influence of treatment planning and survival in surgical oncology remains incompletely defined. The study does not establish causality between CGA and improved outcomes, as it is an observational design. Practice relevance suggests that integrating CGA into preoperative surgical oncology workflows may support individualized, goal-concordant decision-making and help avoid potentially non-beneficial surgery in older adults with cancer.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Frailty is a major determinant of postoperative morbidity, functional decline, and survival in older adults with cancer, yet it is not consistently integrated into oncologic surgical decision-making. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) provides a multidimensional evaluation of physiological reserve, functional status, and patient priorities; but, its influence on treatment planning and survival in surgical oncology remains incompletely defined. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults aged ≥65 years referred for preoperative CGA between 2020 and 2023 at a dedicated geriatric surgery clinic within a large academic center. Patients were stratified by frailty status and CGA-derived clinical recommendation: Fit for Treatment, Prehabilitation & Surgery, or Other Intervention. Primary outcomes were modification of the initial treatment plan and overall survival. Associations were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Among 273 patients (median age 82 years; 42% female), treatment plans were modified in 21%, with modification rates increasing by frailty severity (non-frail 10%, mild–moderate 31%, severe 65%; p CGA-derived recommendations substantially influenced surgical oncology treatment selection and were independently associated with survival, providing prognostic information beyond frailty status alone. Integrating CGA into preoperative surgical oncology workflows may support individualized, goal-concordant decision-making and help avoid potentially non-beneficial surgery in older adults with cancer.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.