Comprehensive geriatric assessment modifies treatment plans and associates with survival in older adults with gastrointestinal malignancies
This retrospective cohort study included 273 adults aged ≥65 years referred for preoperative comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) within a dedicated geriatric surgery clinic at a large academic center. The population consisted of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The primary outcomes assessed were modification of the initial treatment plan and overall survival. No comparator group was reported in the study design.
Regarding the modification of the initial treatment plan, 21% of patients overall experienced a change. When stratified by frailty severity, modification rates were 10% for non-frail patients, 31% for those with mild to moderate frailty, and 65% for those with severe frailty. The study found that CGA-derived recommendations were independently associated with overall survival. Specific effect sizes, absolute numbers for survival, or p-values were not reported in the provided data.
Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, or discontinuations, were not reported. A key limitation noted is that the influence of treatment planning and survival in surgical oncology remains incompletely defined. The study does not establish causality between CGA and improved outcomes, as it is an observational design. Practice relevance suggests that integrating CGA into preoperative surgical oncology workflows may support individualized, goal-concordant decision-making and help avoid potentially non-beneficial surgery in older adults with cancer.