Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Zanidatamab with chemotherapy or tislelizumab achieves 70% objective response rate in HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinomaNew drug combination shows promise for advanced stomach cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider zanidatamab plus chemotherapy/tislelizumab for HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma despite high toxicity.

This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of zanidatamab in combination with chemotherapy and/or tislelizumab for patients with advanced HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. The analysis included a total of 685 patients to determine clinical outcomes and tolerability.

Key findings include a median progression-free survival of 12.61 months (95% CI: 11.05-14.60) and a median overall survival of 26.05 months (95% CI: 23.60-30.04). The objective response rate was 70% (95% CI: 67-74), with a disease control rate of 96% (95% CI: 78-100). The median duration of response was 17.11 months (95% CI: 13.07-22.40).

Safety data indicate significant toxicity, with 66% (95% CI: 50-81%) of patients experiencing serious adverse events. Common adverse events included diarrhea (89%), nausea (60%), and infusion-related reactions (30%). Immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 25% of patients, while left ventricular dysfunction and non-infectious pulmonary toxicity were reported in 6% and 4% of patients, respectively. Treatment-related diarrhea led to dose reductions in 16% of patients.

Zanidatamab demonstrates meaningful activity as a first-line treatment for advanced HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. However, clinicians should weigh these efficacy results against the notable toxicity profile and the 20% discontinuation rate observed in the study population.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in the treatment of advanced HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. While previous evidence noted that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy improves survival in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and that PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy achieve a 64% objective response rate in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, this study specifically evaluates the addition of zanidatamab in the gastroesophageal setting. It provides specific data on the 70% objective response rate and 96% disease control rate for this specific cancer type.

Living with advanced stomach cancer is incredibly difficult, and finding treatments that actually slow the disease is a major priority. New data looks at a treatment involving zanidatamab combined with chemotherapy and sometimes another drug called tislelizumab. This combination was tested in 685 patients with a specific type of cancer called HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

The results showed that 70% of patients had an objective response, meaning their tumors shrank or disappeared. The average time patients lived without their disease getting worse was about 12.6 months, while the average overall survival was about 26 months. These numbers suggest the treatment is active against the cancer, but it is important to look at the full picture of how patients felt during treatment.

While the treatment showed activity, it did come with some side effects. Most patients experienced diarrhea (89%) and many felt nauseous (60%). About 66% of patients experienced serious side effects, and 20% had to stop treatment entirely. Because of these risks, doctors must carefully weigh the benefits of the treatment against these potential complications for each individual patient.

What this means for you:
The zanidatamab combination shows high response rates for certain stomach cancers but carries significant side effects.

Common questions

How well does this treatment work for stomach cancer?

The treatment showed a 70% objective response rate, meaning the cancer shrank or disappeared in most patients. The average time patients lived without their disease getting worse was 12.61 months, and the average overall survival was 26.05 months.

What are the common side effects of this treatment?

Common side effects included diarrhea, which affected 89% of patients, and nausea, which affected 60%. Some patients also experienced infusion-related reactions (30%) and immune-mediated side effects (25%).

Is this treatment safe for everyone?

The treatment has significant risks. About 66% of patients experienced serious side effects, and 20% had to stop treatment. Some specific issues included diarrhea leading to dose reductions and a small number of cases involving heart or lung issues.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 685
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up26.1 mo
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Zanidatamab is a novel HER2-targeted antibody that binds to two non-overlapping extracellular domains of the HER2 receptor. Early-phase trials have shown clinical benefit of first-line Zanidatamab in patients with advanced HER2-positive esophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zanidatamab in this patient population. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, ASCO, and ESMO databases for studies examining zanidatamab as first-line treatment in patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. Outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS); objective response rate (ORR); disease control rate (DCR); duration of response (DOR); and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Analyses were presented as median or proportions in percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random-effect models were used for analysis, which were carried out using R software (v4.5.2). RESULTS: Three clinical trials involving 685 patients with advanced HER2-positive GEA treated with zanidatamab in combination with chemotherapy and/or tislelizumab were included. Overall, the reconstructed pooled median OS was 26.05 months (95% CI: 23.60-30.04), while the pooled median PFS was 12.61 months (95% CI: 11.05-14.60). The pooled ORR was 70% (95% CI, 67-74), DCR was 96% (95% CI, 78-100), and median DOR was 17.11 months (95% CI, 13.07-22.40). Treatment-related diarrhea leading to dose reduction was observed in 16% (95% CI, 1%-75%) of patients. Treatment discontinuation due to any cause rate was 20% (95% CI, 3%-44%). Serious treatment-emergent AEs occurred in 66% (95% CI, 50%-81%) of patients. Common any-grade AEs included diarrhea (89%; 95% CI, 75%-98%), nausea (60%; 95% CI, 45%-74%), and infusion-related reactions (30%; 95% CI, 19%-43%). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, nausea, and treatment-related AEs rates were as follows: 26% (95% CI, 19%-34%), 5% (95% CI, 2%-13%), and 65% (95% CI, 58%-71%), respectively. Other important AEs include immune-mediated AEs (25% incidence rate), left ventricular dysfunction (6% incidence rate), and non-infectious pulmonary toxicity (4% incidence rate). CONCLUSIONS: Our pooled analyses suggest that zanidatamab exhibits meaningful activity as first-line treatment of advanced HER2-positive GEA. Yet, concerning toxicity rates were also consistently reported across studies. Future randomized studies are needed to further explore its activity and safety profile in this population.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.