Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Trastuzumab and tislelizumab show lower probability of health-related quality of life deterioration in gastric cancerTrastuzumab and Tislelizumab May Improve Quality of Life in Gastric Cancer

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that trastuzumab and tislelizumab show lower HR-QoL deterioration in advanced gastric cancer.

This network meta-analysis evaluated first-line systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted agents, and platinum-based chemotherapy, for patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. The analysis included a large sample size of over 8000 patients to assess outcomes including health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) and overall survival (OS).

The authors synthesized data showing that trastuzumab and tislelizumab had the lowest probability of deterioration in HR-QoL domains, including global health status, physical function, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss, and pain. Furthermore, trastuzumab and tislelizumab showed favorable comprehensive performance across most evaluated domains when using a composite metric of HR-QoL and overall survival.

A limitation noted by the authors is that the composite metric for HR-QoL and OS is exploratory and lacks established uncertainty estimates. Therefore, this metric should not serve as primary evidence for clinical decision-making. Clinical relevance is noted for trastuzumab in HER2-positive disease and tislelizumab in largely biomarker-unselected populations, as both appear to balance HR-QoL preservation with OS benefit.

How this fits prior evidence

This network meta-analysis addresses a gap in understanding the balance between survival and quality of life in gastric cancer. While previous evidence noted that thymosin alpha1 plus chemotherapy may improve short-term response and safety in gastric cancer, this study provides specific data on the lower probability of HR-QoL deterioration for trastuzumab and tislelizumab compared to other first-line systemic therapies.

Researchers analyzed data from over 8,000 patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer. They compared different first-line systemic treatments, including platinum-based chemotherapy, the targeted agent trastuzumab, and the immune checkpoint inhibitor tislelizumab. The study looked at how these treatments affected both survival and the daily quality of life for patients.

The results showed that patients receiving trastuzumab or tislelizumab had a lower probability of experiencing a decline in their health-related quality of life. This includes factors like physical function, appetite, and pain levels. When looking at a combined measure of survival and quality of life, both trastuzumab and tislelizumab showed favorable performance across most areas.

It is important to note that these findings come from a large data review, but some parts of the analysis were exploratory. Because the combined metric for quality of life and survival is not yet fully established, it should not be the only factor used to make medical decisions. Patients should talk to their doctors to determine the best treatment plan based on their specific health needs.

What this means for you:
Trastuzumab and tislelizumab may help maintain quality of life for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Common questions

How do these medications affect quality of life for cancer patients?

The study found that patients treated with trastuzumab or tislelizumab had a lower probability of experiencing a decline in their health-related quality of life. This includes improvements in areas like physical function, appetite, and pain management compared to other treatments.

What is the difference between trastuzumab and tislelizumab?

Trastuzumab is used for patients with HER2-positive disease, while tislelizumab is used for a broader range of patients. Both medications showed favorable performance in balancing the preservation of quality of life with overall survival benefits.

Is the data on these treatments conclusive for making medical decisions?

While the results are promising, some parts of the study, such as the combined metric for quality of life and survival, are still exploratory. Patients should consult with their doctors to decide which treatment is best for their specific condition.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the effects of various first-line systemic therapies on health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients with unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC), and to comprehensively integrate survival benefits and HR-QoL outcomes associated with different treatments.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, CENTRAL and Scopus databases for studies published from database inception to December 2025. Manual retrieval of reference lists and abstracts from major oncology conferences held between 2016 and 2025 was performed as supplementary screening. Eligible studies were phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted agents with platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line regimens for advanced GC and reported data on HR-QoL deterioration. Time to deterioration (TTD) of HR-QoL domains was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-STO22 and EQ-5D questionnaires. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was applied to rank all included treatments based on HR-QoL indicators. We further performed an exploratory composite analysis integrating overall-survival and HR-QoL outcomes via the minimum distance criterion.ResultsIn total, 10 RCTs enrolling over 8000 patients and covering six HR-QoL domains met the inclusion criteria. SUCRA analyses indicated that trastuzumab and tislelizumab had the lowest probability of the deterioration of global health status, physical function, nausea/vomiting, appetite loss and pain. When HR-QoL was combined with overall survival (OS) via an exploratory minimum distance criterion composite analysis, trastuzumab and tislelizumab showed favorable comprehensive performance across most evaluated domains. This composite metric remains exploratory without established uncertainty estimates and should not serve as primary evidence for clinical decision-making.ConclusionsThis network meta-analysis suggests that trastuzumab (for HER2-positive disease) and tislelizumab (for largely biomarker-unselected populations) deliver the balance between HR-QoL preservation and OS benefit within their respective biomarker-eligible patient subgroups among systemic treatment options for unresectable advanced GC.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261422326.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.