Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis shows local consolidative therapy plus systemic therapy improves survival in driver-negative oligometastatic NSCLC.

Meta-analysis shows local consolidative therapy plus systemic therapy improves survival in driver-ne…
Photo by Navy Medicine / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider local consolidative therapy plus systemic therapy for driver-negative oligometastatic NSCLC based on improved survival.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of local consolidative therapy combined with systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone. The analysis included 1,698 patients with driver-negative oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The scope focused on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events.

Key findings demonstrated a significant association with improved overall survival, characterized by a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% CI 0.36-0.56). Progression-free survival also showed significant improvement with a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI 0.46-0.61). Additionally, the objective response rate was higher, with a relative risk of 1.47 (95% CI 1.12-1.93).

Regarding safety, there was no significant increase in treatment-related adverse events, with a relative risk of 1.31 (95% CI 0.93-1.84). The authors note that follow-up duration was not reported. No specific limitations or funding conflicts were identified in the source text. The evidence supports a risk-adapted, multidisciplinary treatment strategy in the modern immunotherapy era.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a potentially modifiable stage of metastatic disease, however, the survival benefit of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in patients without actionable driver mutations remains uncertain in the era of immunotherapy. To address this clinically relevant controversy, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy and safety of adding LCT to systemic therapy in driver-negative oligometastatic NSCLC. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library through December 2025 identified 13 eligible studies including 1,698 patients. Pooled analyses demonstrated that the addition of LCT was significantly associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.36-0.56) and progression-free survival (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.61) compared with systemic therapy alone. Notably, cumulative meta-analysis showed that the survival advantage remained stable as evidence accrued over time, underscoring the consistency of the treatment effect. LCT was also associated with a higher objective response rate (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12-1.93) without a significant increase in treatment-related adverse events (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.93-1.84). Importantly, subgroup analyses demonstrated that the survival benefit persisted in studies incorporating immunotherapy-based regimens, suggesting that LCT retains clinical value even within contemporary systemic treatment paradigms. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, and no significant publication bias was detected. Collectively, these results indicate that integrating LCT into systemic therapy is associated with meaningful survival gains in driver-negative oligometastatic NSCLC without added toxicity, supporting a risk-adapted, multidisciplinary treatment strategy in the modern immunotherapy era.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261351878.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.