Meta-analysis shows local consolidative therapy plus systemic therapy improves survival in driver-negative oligometastatic NSCLC.
This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of local consolidative therapy combined with systemic therapy compared to systemic therapy alone. The analysis included 1,698 patients with driver-negative oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer. The scope focused on overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, and treatment-related adverse events.
Key findings demonstrated a significant association with improved overall survival, characterized by a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% CI 0.36-0.56). Progression-free survival also showed significant improvement with a hazard ratio of 0.53 (95% CI 0.46-0.61). Additionally, the objective response rate was higher, with a relative risk of 1.47 (95% CI 1.12-1.93).
Regarding safety, there was no significant increase in treatment-related adverse events, with a relative risk of 1.31 (95% CI 0.93-1.84). The authors note that follow-up duration was not reported. No specific limitations or funding conflicts were identified in the source text. The evidence supports a risk-adapted, multidisciplinary treatment strategy in the modern immunotherapy era.