Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Retrospective observational study evaluates systemic therapy surveillance in brain metastases patients.

Retrospective observational study evaluates systemic therapy surveillance in brain metastases patien…
Photo by Accuray / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider observational evidence on surveillance timing in brain metastases with no significant outcome differences.

This retrospective observational study abstract evaluates surveillance strategies for 33 patients with active brain metastases treated with systemic therapy alone at a single institution. The analysis compared guideline-supported surveillance versus non-guideline-supported surveillance based on 2021 ASCO-SNO-ASTRO guidelines. The study aimed to assess timing of imaging and clinical outcomes associated with adherence to these recommendations.

Median time to the first surveillance MRI was 45 days, with a range of 18 to 207 days. The median time to the second surveillance MRI was 95 days, ranging from 46 to 204 days. The median time to the third surveillance MRI was 180 days, with a range of 74 to 329 days. Regarding 1-year cumulative incidence, local progression was 0.43 in the guideline group versus 0.32 in the non-guideline group (p=0.5). 14/33 patients met guidelines. Brain radiation incidence was 0.29 in the guideline group versus 0.44 in the non-guideline group (p=0.87).

Safety data indicated 2 patients experienced safety events, specifically seizures while on systemic therapy. The authors acknowledge limitations including the retrospective design, single institution setting, and variable surveillance imaging frequency. They note there is little evidence guiding surveillance in this setting.

Evidence-based guidelines for surveillance will be warranted according to the authors. Interpretation requires caution due to the observational nature and small sample size of 33. Associations reported do not establish causation between surveillance adherence and outcomes.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionRadiotherapy has long been first-line treatment for brain metastases. However, CNS penetrating systemic therapies are increasingly used as first-line alternatives. There is little evidence guiding surveillance in this setting. Here we retrospectively assessed surveillance strategies at a single institution and associated outcomes.MethodsRecords from 33 patients, evaluated from 2021–2024 and treated with systemic therapy alone for active brain metastases, were reviewed. Time from diagnosis to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd surveillance MRI, incidence of intracranial progression, survival, and neurological adverse events were assessed. Patients were stratified by whether treatment was supported by the 2021 ASCO-SNO-ASTRO guidelines.ResultsTreatment met guidelines for 14/33 patients. Median (range) time to 1st, 2nd, and 3rd MRI was 45 (18-207), 95 (46-204), and 180 (74-329) days, respectively. One-year cumulative incidence of local progression in the guideline group was 0.43 (95% CI [0.18-0.66]) and in the non-guideline group was 0.32 (95% CI [0.13-0.52], p=0.5). One-year cumulative incidence of brain radiation in the guideline group was 0.29 (95% CI [0.09-0.53]) and in the non-guideline group was 0.44 (95% CI [0.22-0.64], p=0.87). Two patients experienced safety events on systemic therapy (seizures).DiscussionUse of CNS-penetrating systemic therapies to treat brain metastases outpaced national guidelines in this study. While surveillance imaging frequency was variable and recurrences were common, many patients were able to delay radiation for over one year, with infrequent safety events. As interest in and options for CNS-penetrating systemic therapy grow, evidence-based guidelines for surveillance will be warranted.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.