This retrospective cohort study used data from the SEER database (2000–2022) and Fujian Cancer Hospital to develop a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with uterine serous carcinoma. The model incorporated age, FIGO stage, T stage, N stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery, and compared high-risk versus low-risk groups. The sample size was 8,204 patients.
The main results showed that the 5-year OS prediction AUC was 0.79, 0.78, and 0.72 across three distinct patient cohorts. OS differences between high-risk and low-risk groups were significant (P < 0.05). No absolute numbers, effect sizes, or confidence intervals were reported for these outcomes.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported, as adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were all noted as not reported. The follow-up duration was not reported.
Key limitations include the retrospective design, which limits causal inference, and the lack of reported safety data. The practice relevance supports clinicians in performing individualized risk stratification, guiding patient counseling, and optimizing adjuvant therapeutic decisions, but the evidence is observational and should not be overinterpreted.
View Original Abstract ↓
PurposeUterine serous carcinoma (USC) is known for its aggressive behavior, high recurrence rate, and poor prognosis. Despite its clinical importance, personalized prognostic tools for USC are limited. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a nomogram to help gynecologic oncologists accurately predict patient survival and create personalized treatment regimens.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted using clinical records of USC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2000–2022). Patients were randomly split into training and internal validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. An independent external validation cohort was also used from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Model performance was evaluated using time-dependent ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe study included 8,204 USC patients from both SEER and Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital cohorts. Multivariate Cox regression showed that age, FIGO stage, T stage, N stage, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgery were significant independent prognostic factors for OS (all P < 0.05). The nomogram incorporating these variables displayed robust discriminatory capacity, yielding 5-year OS prediction AUC values of 0.79, 0.78, and 0.72 across the three distinct patient cohorts. Calibration plots demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. DCA indicated substantial clinical benefit. Survival analysis revealed significant differences in OS between the high-risk and low-risk groups (P < 0.05).ConclusionsA reliable and well−validated nomogram was established for predicting OS in USC patients. This predictive tool supports clinicians in performing individualized risk stratification, guiding patient counseling, and optimizing adjuvant therapeutic decisions.