Combination immunotherapy and targeted therapy regimens show favorable survival outcomes versus monotherapies in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
This systematic review and pooled analysis of parametric survival curves from 15 randomized controlled trials assessed first-line treatment strategies for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Individual patient data were reconstructed from published Kaplan–Meier curves using digitization methods to compare monotherapies against combination regimens and various first-line strategies.
Combination regimens generally demonstrated more favorable survival outcomes than monotherapies, based on time-dependent hazard ratios (HRs) estimated using parametric survival models. Clear departures from the proportional hazards assumption were observed, indicating that treatment effects varied over time. Finotonlimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar consistently showed the highest predicted overall survival and progression-free survival probabilities across multiple time points.
Safety, tolerability, adverse events, serious adverse events, and discontinuations were not reported in this analysis. Key limitations include the dependence of long-term comparisons on extrapolated estimates and the violation of the proportional hazards assumption. Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported.
Systemic therapy remains the cornerstone of first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. However, extrapolated estimates for long-term comparisons should be interpreted cautiously, and association between treatment regimens and survival outcomes must be considered in the context of time-dependent effects.