Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Integrated Nomogram Combines Habitat Analysis and Radiomics to Predict Ki-67 in Breast Cancer

Integrated Nomogram Combines Habitat Analysis and Radiomics to Predict Ki-67 in Breast Cancer
Photo by Wolfgang Hasselmann / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider this integrated nomogram as a promising but unvalidated tool for noninvasive Ki-67 assessment in breast cancer.

This retrospective cohort study included 288 women with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. Researchers constructed a nomogram that integrated habitat analysis with ultrasound-based radiomics and clinicopathological variables to noninvasively assess Ki-67 overexpression. The model's performance was compared with single-modality approaches.

In the training cohort, the nomogram achieved an AUC of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.826–0.929). In the validation cohort, the AUC was 0.830. Sensitivity was 60.3% and specificity was 91.7%. Calibration was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, showing close agreement in both training (p = 0.14) and validation (p = 0.19) cohorts.

Safety and tolerability were not reported, as this was a diagnostic modeling study. Key limitations include that conventional ultrasound radiomics often fails to fully capture intratumoral heterogeneity, suffers from overfitting, and includes redundant features that limit generalizability.

This nomogram offers a non-invasive predictive tool for Ki-67 expression, potentially enhancing precision of tumor biology assessment. However, the findings are associative and require prospective validation before clinical implementation.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAccurate preoperative assessment of Ki-67 proliferation index remains a clinical challenge in breast cancer management. Conventional ultrasound radiomics often fails to fully capture intratumoral heterogeneity, suffers from overfitting, and includes redundant features that limit generalizability.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed preoperative ultrasound images and immunohistochemical results from 288 women with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. We extracted both conventional radiomic features and intratumoral habitat features, computed risk scores, and integrated them with clinicopathological variables (e.g., progesterone receptor status, lymph node involvement) to construct a nomogram. Model performance was assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe Clinics_Habitat_Radiomics model achieved AUCs of 0.877 (95% CI: 0.826–0.929) in the training cohort and in the validation cohort, the model achieved an AUC of 0.830, with a sensitivity of 60.3% and specificity of 91.7%, significantly outperforming other models. Calibration curves indicated close agreement between predicted probabilities and observed outcomes (Hosmer–Lemeshow test: p = 0.14 [training], p = 0.19 [validation]). DCA demonstrated superior net clinical benefit across a range of threshold probabilities compared with single-modality approaches.ConclusionsThe integration of habitat analysis with ultrasound-based radiomics enables the development of a nomogram that synergistically incorporates multimodal imaging features and clinicopathological parameters, offering a non-invasive predictive tool for Ki-67 expression in breast cancer. This model not only enhances the precision of tumor biology assessment but also provides actionable insights for optimizing therapeutic regimens, monitoring treatment responses, and stratifying prognostic risks, thereby bridging the gap between radiomic diagnostics and personalized oncology care.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.