Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

PHS601-based stratification increases prostate cancer risk estimates in Norwegian population-based cohortsGenetic test shows higher prostate cancer risk in specific groups

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note increased prostate cancer risk with PHS601 stratification in Norwegian cohorts.

This cohort study evaluated PHS601-based stratification within Norwegian population-based cohorts. The analysis included 14,688 individuals in cohort 1, 2,850 in cohort 2, and 503 in a whole-genome sequencing subset. The primary outcome assessed age-at-diagnosis of prostate cancer and aggressive prostate cancer. A comparator of rare pathogenic variant testing involving HOXB13 was also examined.

In cohort 1, the hazard ratio for prostate cancer risk stratification was 5.74 with a 95% CI [5.06, 6.45]. For aggressive prostate cancer risk stratification in cohort 1, the hazard ratio was 4.60 with a 95% CI [3.19, 6.45]. In cohort 2, the hazard ratio for prostate cancer risk stratification was 7.79 with a 95% CI [5.70, 10.59]. The hazard ratio for aggressive prostate cancer risk stratification in cohort 2 was 3.14 with a 95% CI [1.49, 6.63].

In the whole-genome sequencing subset, the top 1.8% of PHS values showed an 8.8-fold higher risk with a hazard ratio of 8.78 and a 95% CI [5.00, 14.40]. Risk associated with HOXB13 pathogenic variants yielded a hazard ratio of 3.77 with a 95% CI [1.75, 8.11]. Adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. Limitations and funding information were not reported.

The study supports context-specific use of genotyping-based risk stratification in population screening. Causality was not reported. The certainty of the findings is not reported.

Researchers analyzed data from two large groups of people in Norway to look at prostate cancer risk. The first group had 14,688 participants, and the second had 2,850. A smaller subset of 503 people had their whole genomes sequenced. The team used a genetic test called PHS601 to sort participants into risk groups. They compared these results to a test that looks for rare gene changes in the HOXB13 gene.

The study found that men in the highest risk group had a much higher chance of developing prostate cancer. In the first group, the risk was 5.74 times higher than the lowest risk group. In the second group, the risk was 7.79 times higher. When looking at aggressive forms of the disease, the risk was still significantly elevated in the top groups.

In the smaller group with full genome sequencing, men in the top 1.8 percent of scores had an 8.8-fold higher risk compared to the median. Men with rare HOXB13 gene changes also showed a 3.77 times higher risk. The study did not report any safety concerns or side effects. This research supports using genetic tests to help identify who might need closer monitoring for prostate cancer.

What this means for you:
Genetic scores can identify men with much higher prostate cancer risk, but this applies to specific populations.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
Sample sizen = 14,688
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
More accurate risk prediction is needed for prostate cancer (PCa) to identify individuals at greatest risk of early-onset and clinically significant disease. Current screening paradigms, such as prostate-specific antigen screening, pose risks due to over-diagnosis and over-treatment of indolent disease. Polygenic hazard scores (PHS) can predict age-at-diagnosis of PCa and are being tested in prospective clinical screening trials. We assessed the performance of the latest PHS model for PCa (PHS601) in two Norwegian cohorts (N = 14,688 and N = 2,850) for predicting age-at-diagnosis of PCa and aggressive PCa. In a subset with whole-genome sequencing (N = 503), we directly compared PHS601-based stratification with screening for rare pathogenic variants. PHS601 effectively stratified participants by risk in both cohorts for both PCa (HR80/20 = 5.74, 95% CI [5.06, 6.45] and 7.79 95% CI [5.70, 10.59]) and aggressive PCa (HR80/20 = 4.60, 95% CI [3.19, 6.45] and 3.14 95% CI [1.49, 6.63]). Among individuals with whole-genome sequencing, the top 1.8% of PHS values conferred 8.8-fold higher risk than the median (HR = 8.78 [5.00, 14.40]), exceeding the risk associated with HOXB13 pathogenic variants (HR = 3.77 [1.75, 8.11]; 1.8% carrier frequency). This study provides the first external validation of PHS601 in independent Norwegian population-based cohorts and, within a WGS subset, a direct comparison with rare variant screening, supporting context-specific use of genotyping-based risk stratification in population screening.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.