Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis links higher prognostic nutritional index to better survival in non-small cell lung cancer

Systematic review and meta-analysis links higher prognostic nutritional index to better survival…
Photo by Stephen Dawson / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note higher PNI associates with better survival in non-small cell lung cancer after resection.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) among patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent curative lung resection. The authors synthesized data from 11 studies to evaluate how PNI levels relate to survival outcomes in this surgical population.

The primary finding indicates that a higher PNI is significantly associated with longer overall survival. The pooled analysis reported a hazard ratio of 0.79 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.72 to 0.87. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival and cancer-specific survival, though specific effect sizes for these were not detailed in the provided data.

The authors explicitly state that the observed relationship represents an association and caution against inferring causation. Safety data, including adverse events or tolerability, were not reported in the source material. The review highlights the potential utility of PNI as a prognostic marker but emphasizes the need for further research to confirm clinical relevance.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients undergoing curative surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsRelevant studies published up to October 2025 were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Observational studies assessing the association between PNI and overall, recurrence-free, or cancer-specific survival after curative resection of NSCLC were included. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was evaluated by the I² statistic, with sensitivity analyses and assessment for publication bias.ResultsA total of 11 studies were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis indicated that higher PNI significantly associated with longer OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.72–0.87, P
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.