Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Shows Anatomic and Visual Gains in Irvine-Gass Syndrome Meta-Analysis

Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Shows Anatomic and Visual Gains in Irvine-Gass Syndrome Meta-Analysis
Photo by Dmytro Vynohradov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider anti-VEGF for IGS based on retrospective data showing visual/anatomic gains, but superiority over placebo is uncertain.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS), pooling data from 343 eyes of 334 patients. The analysis included seven retrospective studies and one randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study, with a mean follow-up of 6.0 months. The comparator was sham injection in the single randomized trial; other studies lacked a formal control group.

At 6 months, treatment was associated with a mean improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.65 logMAR (95% CI: -0.83; -0.47) and a mean decrease in central macular thickness (CMT) of 290.41 µm (95% CI: -351.33; -229.54). In the three studies reporting it, the percentage of eyes achieving resolution of cystoid macular edema (CME) ranged from 66.4% to 100%. Safety and tolerability data were not reported.

Key limitations significantly constrain the findings. The primary outcome of CME resolution was reported too heterogeneously to allow for meta-analysis. Superiority over placebo remains uncertain, as most evidence comes from retrospective studies. The authors note a need for randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

For practice, this analysis suggests potential anatomic and functional benefits of intravitreal anti-VEGF in treating IGS, but the evidence is not definitive. Clinicians should interpret these associations cautiously due to the study designs and lack of comparative efficacy data against other treatments or placebo.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 334
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up6.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents in the treatment of Irvine-Gass syndrome (IGS). METHODS: Systematic review with meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the percentage with resolution of cystoid macular edema (CME). Secondary outcomes were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to time of follow-up. A meta-analysis was conducted on changes in BCVA and CMT from baseline to a 6-month follow-up visit. RESULTS: Seven retrospective studies and one randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter study provided data on a total of 343 eyes of 334 patients. The primary outcome was reported too heterogeneously to allow for meta-analysis, but three studies reported resolution of CME during follow-up in 66.4% to 100% of eyes treated. At 6 months after treatment initiation, the mean improvement in BCVA was 0.65 (95%CI: -0.83; -0.47) logMAR, and the mean decrease in CMT was 290.41 (95%CI: -351.33; -229.54) µm. CONCLUSION: Current literature suggests potential benefits of intravitreal anti-VEGF in treating IGS. However, its superiority over placebo remains uncertain, suggesting the need for randomized, placebo-controlled trials.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.