Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

CW-CPC shows greater sustained IOP reduction than MP-CPC in pediatric glaucoma meta-analysis

CW-CPC shows greater sustained IOP reduction than MP-CPC in pediatric glaucoma meta-analysis
Photo by Cht Gsml / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider CW-CPC for more sustained IOP reduction in pediatric glaucoma, but note high heterogeneity and absent safety data.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MP-CPC) with continuous wave cyclophotocoagulation (CW-CPC) for intraocular pressure reduction in children with glaucoma. The analysis included comparative studies with a mean follow-up of 12.0 months, though the total sample size and specific study designs of included trials were not reported.

At 12 months, CW-CPC showed significantly greater IOP reduction than MP-CPC, with a mean difference of -6.88 mm Hg (95% CI: -9.46 to -4.30; P < 0.00001). At 1, 3, and 6 months, no significant differences in IOP lowering were observed between techniques. In the overall analysis of IOP reduction at last follow-up, CW-CPC remained superior with a mean difference of -4.23 mm Hg (95% CI: -6.51 to -1.95; P = 0.0003).

Key limitations include high statistical heterogeneity (I² = 80%) in the overall analysis, which suggests substantial variability between included studies. Safety outcomes, adverse events, tolerability, and discontinuation rates were not reported. The funding sources and potential conflicts of interest were also not reported.

For clinical practice, these findings suggest CW-CPC may provide more sustained IOP control in pediatric glaucoma compared with MP-CPC, particularly beyond 6 months. However, the absence of safety data and high heterogeneity limit definitive conclusions. Clinicians should consider these results alongside individual patient factors and the procedural risk profiles of each technique.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up12.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
PRÉCIS: In this systematic review, we find that CW-CPC produces more sustained IOP lowering in children compared with MP-CPC. PURPOSE: Micropulse cyclophotocoagulation (MP-CPC) and continuous cyclophotocoagulation (CW-CPC) are both surgical interventions used to decrease intraocular pressure (IOP) in pediatric glaucoma. Recent publications have shown conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of MP-CPC compared with CW-CPC, which this systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate. METHODS: From inception through March 2025, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ScienceDirect were searched for studies comparing MP-CPC and CW-CPC in treating pediatric glaucoma, with IOP reported at different time intervals. A random effects model was used across all analyses. RESULTS: At 12 months, CW-CPC showed a significantly greater reduction in IOP compared with MP-CPC (MD: -6.88 mm Hg, 95% CI: -9.46 to -4.30; P < 0.00001). No significant differences in IOP lowering were observed at 1, 3, and 6 months. Overall, CW-CPC was superior in reducing IOP (MD: -4.23 mm Hg, 95% CI: -6.51 to -1.95; P = 0.0003; I² = 80%) at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: CW-CPC shows a significantly greater reduction in IOP than MP-CPC, particularly at long-term follow-up. These findings highlight the sustained efficacy of CW-CPC compared with MP-CPC in the management of pediatric glaucoma.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.