Researchers looked at how different surgical methods affect healing in patients with talar neck fractures. They compared a method called arthroscopically assisted reduction and internal fixation (ARIF) against percutaneous fixation (PF). Both groups showed a 100% radiographic healing rate, meaning the bones healed well in both cases.
However, the study found that the ARIF group had significantly fewer complications than the PF group. Specifically, only 1% of patients in the ARIF group experienced complications compared to 19% in the other group. Additionally, no patients in the ARIF group developed early peri-talar osteoarthritis before 48 months, while 11% of those in the PF group did.
It is important to note that these findings come from a small number of studies with varying quality. Because the evidence level is low and the sample sizes were small, these results should not be seen as a definitive rule for every patient. You should talk to your surgeon about which technique is best for your specific injury.