Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Surgical fixation of posterior malleolus does not improve functional or radiological outcomes in tri-malleolar fracturesSurgical Fixation Shows No Advantage for Certain Ankle Fractures

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that surgical fixation of the posterior malleolus does not improve functional or radiological outcomes in tri-malleolar fractures.

This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of surgical fixation versus no-fixation for patients with tri-malleolar fractures involving posterior malleolar fragments (PMFs) of less than or equal to 30% of the articular surface. The analysis included 883 patients across multiple studies to compare functional and radiological outcomes.

The meta-analysis reported no significant differences between the fixation and no-fixation groups across primary and secondary outcomes. Specifically, AOFAS scores showed no significant difference (MD 3.76; 95% CI -3.56 to 11.08; P = 0.31). Similarly, OMAS scores showed no significant difference (MD 0.35; 95% CI -6.29 to 6.99; P = 0.92). Regarding the incidence of OA grade 2 or higher, no significant difference was found (OR 0.84; 95% CI 0.32 to 2.22; P = 0.73).

The authors noted high study heterogeneity, which necessitates a cautious interpretation of the results. GRADE certainty was low for functional outcomes and very low for the incidence of OA. Clinical evidence suggests that surgical fixation of the posterior malleolus does not demonstrate superior functional or radiological outcomes compared to no-fixation for this specific fracture population.

This meta-analysis looked at 883 patients with tri-malleolar ankle fractures. Specifically, it focused on cases where the posterior malleolar fragment involved 30% or less of the articular surface. Researchers compared patients who received surgical fixation of the posterior malleolus against those who did not receive fixation.

The study found no significant differences between the two groups in terms of functional scores or radiological outcomes. Specifically, both the AOFAS and OMAS scores were similar for both groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of osteoarthritis grade 2 or higher between those who had surgery and those who did not.

Because of high study heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted with caution. The evidence for functional outcomes was rated as low certainty, and the evidence for osteoarthritis was rated as very low certainty. Currently, the data suggests that surgical fixation does not show superior results for these specific types of fractures.

What this means for you:
Surgical fixation may not provide better functional outcomes for specific tri-malleolar ankle fractures.

Common questions

Does surgical fixation improve outcomes for tri-malleolar fractures?

The study found no significant difference in functional or radiological outcomes between patients who received surgical fixation and those who did not. This applies specifically to tri-malleolar fractures where the posterior malleolar fragment is 30% or less of the articular surface. You should discuss these specific findings with your surgeon.

Does surgery reduce the risk of arthritis in these fractures?

The study found no significant difference in the incidence of osteoarthritis grade 2 or higher between the fixation and no-fixation groups. However, the researchers noted that the certainty of this specific finding was very low due to high study heterogeneity.

How many patients were included in this analysis?

The meta-analysis included a total of 883 patients with tri-malleolar fractures. The study compared outcomes across different groups to see if surgical fixation provided any measurable benefit for the specific fracture types mentioned.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 883
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up565.2 mo
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses the ongoing debate regarding the optimal management of posterior malleolar fragments in tri-malleolar ankle fractures, particularly when fragment size involves less than 25-30% of the articular surface. Current treatment guidelines are inconsistent, with limited evidence supporting routine surgical fixation of smaller fragments. This study aimed to compare functional and radiological outcomes in patients with tri-malleolar fractures involving PMFs (≤30%) managed with surgical fixation versus non-fixation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, including MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases for studies published between April 2006 and April 2025. Studies directly comparing surgical fixation to non-fixation in this context were included and meta-analysis were performed when at least two or more studies reported identical outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools for both randomised & non-randomised studies. RESULTS: Ten studies (two RCTs, eight cohort studies; 883 patients; mean age 47.1 years; mean follow-up of 41.09 ± 30.03 months in fixation group and 43.12 ± 28.47 months in the no-fixation group) were included. No significant difference was found in AOFAS scores (seven studies, n = 490; MD 3.76, 95% CI -3.56-11.08; P = 0.31; I² = 95%), OMAS (four studies, n = 529; MD 0.35, 95% CI -6.29-6.99; P = 0.92; I² = 71%), or incidence of OA ≥grade 2 (eight studies, n = 755; OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.32-2.22; P = 0.73; I² = 71%). GRADE certainty was low for functional outcomes and very low for OA. CONCLUSION: Although high study heterogeneity warrants cautious interpretation and highlights the need for further research, this study showed that surgical fixation of the posterior malleolus does not demonstrate superior functional or radiological outcomes compared to no-fixation.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.