Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Intraoperative imaging identifies mal-reduction requiring immediate revision in 22% of zygomaticomaxillary complex fracturesIntraoperative Imaging Helps Detect Mal-reduction in Facial Bone Fractures

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that intraoperative imaging identifies mal-reduction requiring immediate revision in 22% of zygomaticomaxillary fractures.

This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of intraoperative imaging, including CT, CBCT, and C-arm fluoroscopy, for assessing reduction and fixation in patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures. The study included a total of 652 patients to determine the prevalence of intraoperative revision and the utility of real-time imaging.

The analysis reported a pooled prevalence of intraoperative revision of 22% (95% CI: 17% to 27%). Specific revision rates were reported as 25% for CT, 20% for CBCT, and 19% for C-arm fluoroscopy. Additionally, no significant difference was found between orbital floor exploration and non-exploration groups (p = 0.15).

Evidence quality was rated as moderate-to-low for CT and low for both CBCT and C-arm fluoroscopy. While intraoperative imaging provides real-time assessment of reduction and identifies mal-reduction requiring immediate correction, the quality of evidence for specific modalities is limited. Clinical application should consider these findings as an assessment of intraoperative detection rather than a confirmed causal link to long-term clinical outcomes.

A review of data from 652 patients with zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures looked at how intraoperative imaging helps during surgery. This type of imaging includes techniques like CT scans, CBCT, or C-arm fluoroscopy. The goal is to check if the bone fragments are correctly positioned and secured during the procedure.

The analysis found that intraoperative imaging identifies cases requiring immediate revision in about 22% of patients. Specifically, the revision rates were 25% for CT, 20% for CBCT, and 19% for C-arm fluoroscopy. The study also found no significant difference in outcomes between groups where the orbital floor was explored and those where it was not.

It is important to note that the quality of evidence for these findings is limited. The data for CT scans was rated as moderate-to-low, while the evidence for CBCT and C-arm was rated as low. While these tools help surgeons see if a bone is misplaced during surgery, the results show a link to immediate correction rather than a proven long-term clinical improvement. Patients should discuss these surgical options with their specialists.

What this means for you:
Intraoperative imaging can help surgeons identify and fix misplaced bone fragments during facial fracture surgery.

Common questions

What is the purpose of intraoperative imaging in facial surgery?

Intraoperative imaging, such as CT, CBCT, or C-arm fluoroscopy, allows surgeons to assess the reduction and fixation of facial bone fractures in real-time. It helps identify if a bone is not properly positioned so it can be corrected immediately during the operation.

How often does intraoperative imaging lead to a revision during surgery?

The study found a pooled prevalence of 22% for intraoperative revision. Specifically, the revision rates were 25% for CT, 20% for CBCT, and 19% for C-arm fluoroscopy. These figures represent cases where a correction was needed during the procedure.

Is the evidence for these imaging techniques strong?

The evidence quality for these findings is not very high. The study rated the evidence for CT scans as moderate-to-low, while the evidence for CBCT and C-arm fluoroscopy was rated as low. These limitations mean the results should be viewed with caution.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 652
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedNov 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures are among the most common midfacial injuries, but achieving accurate reduction is challenging due to the complex anatomy and limited intraoperative visualisation. Traditional intraoperative assessment is subjective and often leads to residual asymmetry, prompting the use of computed tomography (CT), cone-beam CT (CBCT) and C-arm fluoroscopy to improve surgical accuracy and outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis followed PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched until June 2025. Studies using intraoperative CT, CBCT, or C-arm for ZMC fracture management were included. Risk of bias was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and evidence quality with GRADE. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of intraoperative revision. Fourteen studies involving 652 patients were included. Intraoperative imaging was primarily used to assess reduction and fixation of ZMC fractures. The pooled prevalence of intraoperative revision was 22% (95% CI: 17% to 27%) with low to moderate heterogeneity (I = 32.6%). Subgroup analysis showed revision rates of 25% for CT, 20% for CBCT, and 19% for C-arm. No significant difference was found between orbital floor exploration and non-exploration groups (p = 0.15). Evidence quality was rated moderate-to-low for CT, and low for CBCT and C-arm with GRADE analysis. Intraoperative imaging provides effective real-time assessment of ZMC fracture reduction and fixation. Residual mal-reduction requiring immediate revision was detected in approximately 22% of cases, supporting the routine use of intraoperative imaging to potentially reduce secondary corrective procedures.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.