Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis links Type 2 Diabetes to higher fracture risk across multiple anatomical sites

Systematic review and meta-analysis links Type 2 Diabetes to higher fracture risk across multiple an…
Photo by isens usa / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider site-specific fracture prevention strategies for individuals with Type 2 Diabetes given increased risk.

This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed fracture risk in a large cohort of 13,074,868 individuals, comprising 2,644,443 people with Type 2 Diabetes and 10,430,425 without the condition. The primary outcome measured fracture risk at various anatomical sites, comparing those with the disease to those without it. The study design was a systematic review and meta-analysis rather than a primary randomized trial.

The analysis reported a 25% increased risk for all anatomical sites, with a hazard ratio of 1.25 and a 95% CI of 1.20 to 1.31. Specifically, appendicular lower limb fractures showed a hazard ratio of 1.43 with a 95% CI of 1.30 to 1.57. Upper limb fractures had a hazard ratio of 1.29 and a 95% CI of 1.16 to 1.45. Osteoporotic or fragility fractures were associated with a hazard ratio of 1.14 and a 95% CI of 1.02 to 1.28. Women with Type 2 Diabetes demonstrated a significantly higher fracture risk than men, though specific effect sizes for this comparison were not reported.

The authors noted heterogeneity among studies as a key limitation. They emphasized that caution is required in the interpretation of these findings due to this heterogeneity. The practice relevance highlights the importance of targeted fracture prevention strategies and site-specific risk assessment for individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. No adverse events or discontinuations were reported in the safety data.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to quantify the association between Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and the risk of fracture at various anatomical sites by synthesising data from cohort studies. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted across Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Web of Science databases, from inception to 10 June 2025. We estimated pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024548795). RESULTS: This meta-analysis of 22 studies, selected from 6534 screened studies, assessed a total of 13,074,868 individuals (2,644,443 people with T2D and 10,430,425 without T2D). People with T2D have a 25% increased risk of fractures (all anatomical sites) compared to individuals without T2D (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.20 to 1.31). T2D was significantly associated with an increased risk of appendicular lower limb fractures (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.57), upper limb fractures (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.45), osteoporotic/fragility fractures (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.28) and appendicular unspecified fractures (HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.48). Subgroup analyses indicated stronger associations in prospective studies. Women with T2D had a significantly higher fracture risk than men. Meta-regression analyses showed that a higher percentage of women participants and a longer duration of T2D were associated with stronger associations between T2D and fracture risk, particularly for lower limb fractures. CONCLUSION: T2D is associated with an increased risk of fractures, especially in lower limbs (hip, ankle and foot). These findings highlight the importance of targeted fracture prevention strategies and site-specific risk assessment for individuals with T2D. However, due to the heterogeneity among studies, caution is required in the interpretation of these findings.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.