Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Multidisciplinary decision-making and structured protocols are essential for ECMO withdrawal in cardiac and respiratory failureExperts Identify Need for Better ECMO Withdrawal Protocols

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note the need for multidisciplinary decision-making and structured protocols for ECMO withdrawal in end-of-life care.

This narrative review explores the clinical and ethical complexities of ECMO withdrawal in patients experiencing cardiac and respiratory failure. The authors synthesize current evidence to highlight the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making and the necessity of longitudinal goals-of-care discussions. The review advocates for proactive symptom management and structured approaches to compassionate discontinuation to improve end-of-life care.

Significant gaps in the current evidence base are identified, particularly regarding informed consent, standardized withdrawal protocols, and adequate support for clinicians navigating these decisions. The authors note that institutional variations in practice and a lack of standardized guidance contribute to these challenges.

From a clinical perspective, the review identifies a critical need for standardized withdrawal protocols. The authors propose a specific consent template to improve communication and align expectations with patients and families. While the review does not provide specific clinical guidelines, it underscores the necessity of structured communication in end-of-life care for patients on ECMO.

How this fits prior evidence

This narrative review addresses a gap in the management of patients with respiratory failure. While prior coverage noted that carbocisteine and hypertonic saline did not reduce ventilation duration and that telemedicine can increase spontaneous breathing trial frequency, this review focuses specifically on the end-of-life transition and withdrawal protocols for patients requiring ECMO.

This review looked at the process of withdrawing Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for adults with heart or lung failure. Because ECMO is a complex life support system, the decision to stop it is common but often difficult. The review found that these situations require a team of different specialists working together to manage patient symptoms and goals.

Currently, there is a lack of standard rules for how to handle these cases. The review found that many gaps exist regarding how doctors get consent from families and how they support the medical staff during the process. Because practices vary between different hospitals, it can be hard for families to know what to expect.

To help, the review suggests using a specific consent template. This tool aims to improve communication and make sure everyone is on the same page regarding end-of-life care. While this review does not provide a set of strict rules, it highlights the need for better ways to talk to families and support doctors during these difficult moments.

What this means for you:
The review highlights the need for standard protocols and better communication when withdrawing ECMO life support.

Common questions

What is ECMO and who is it for?

ECMO is a life support system used for adults experiencing heart or lung failure. It helps circulate blood and oxygen when the body cannot do so on its own. This review focuses on the complex decisions made when it is time to stop this treatment.

Why is there a need for new protocols?

Currently, there is a lack of standardized guidance and many gaps in how doctors handle consent and support for staff. Because practices vary between institutions, a standard approach could help improve communication and align expectations for end-of-life care.

How can communication be improved for families?

The review suggests using a specific consent template to help doctors and families talk about goals of care. This approach aims to make the process of withdrawing ECMO more structured and clear for everyone involved.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used to support patients with cardiac or respiratory failure as a bridge to recovery, transplantation, or durable mechanical circulatory support. When these goals cannot be achieved, withdrawal of ECMO presents complex clinical and ethical challenges, yet standardized guidance remains limited. We performed a narrative review of the literature from ECMO inception through June 2026 using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and JSTOR. Studies, guidelines, registry analyses, and commentaries addressing ECMO withdrawal, transplant eligibility, communication, and end-of-life care in adults were included. Withdrawal of ECMO is common, particularly among patients receiving VA ECMO, but practices vary considerably across institutions. Decisions are typically made by surrogate decision-makers after determination that recovery, transplantation, or durable mechanical support is no longer feasible. Current evidence emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary decision-making, longitudinal goals-of-care discussions, proactive symptom management, and structured approaches to compassionate ECMO discontinuation. We also identify substantial gaps in evidence regarding consent, withdrawal protocols, and clinician support. ECMO withdrawal remains an understudied area with institutional variation and without standardized best practices. We propose reframing ECMO consent as an ongoing goals-of-care process and present an ECMO-specific consent template to improve communication, align expectations, and support compassionate, patient-centered end-of-life care. Further research is needed to inform evidence-based guidelines.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.