Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Plyometric Training Boosts Jump, Sprint, Agility in TeensPlyometric training improves jumping, sprinting, and agility in adolescents

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Plyometric training significantly improves jump, sprint, and agility performance in healthy adolescents, especially with programs lasting at least 10 weeks.

A meta-analysis of 63 randomized controlled trials examined the effects of plyometric training (PT) on physical performance in healthy adolescents aged 10-19 years. The analysis revealed significant improvements in jump performance (SMD = 0.648, 95% CI [0.523-0.772], p < 0.001), sprint performance (SMD = -0.496, 95% CI [-0.609 to -0.383], p < 0.001), and agility performance (SMD = -0.659, 95% CI [-0.851 to -0.467], p < 0.001). These findings were consistent even after adjusting for dependency in effect sizes.

The results suggest that PT is an effective training modality for enhancing key athletic performance metrics in adolescents. The effect sizes were moderate to large, indicating meaningful improvements. Notably, interventions lasting at least 10 weeks appeared to yield the most benefit.

However, the study noted significant between-study heterogeneity and variability in testing protocols. Subgroup analyses by sex and sport were limited by small sample sizes, making those findings exploratory. No adverse events were reported, but safety data were not systematically collected.

Overall, this meta-analysis provides strong evidence that plyometric training can improve jumping, sprinting, and agility in healthy adolescents. Clinicians and coaches may consider incorporating PT into training programs for this population, with attention to program duration and individualization.

If you have a teenager who plays sports or wants to get faster and more agile, the right kind of training matters. New data from 63 different studies shows that plyometric training—which involves explosive movements like jumping—can significantly boost performance in young athletes.

Researchers looked at adolescents between the ages of 10 and 19. They found that these specific exercises led to clear improvements in three key areas: jumping, sprinting, and agility. These results were consistent across the data, showing that plyometric movements help kids move more powerfully and quickly.

While the findings are promising, there is some variety in how different studies were conducted. Some smaller groups of studies focused on specific genders or sports had less certain results because the sample sizes were small. However, the overall evidence suggests that staying consistent with these movements for at least 10 weeks can help teenagers reach their physical goals.

What this means for you:
Plyometric training significantly improves jumping, sprinting, and agility in adolescents after 10 weeks of practice.

Common questions

What kind of improvements did the study find?

The analysis of 63 studies showed that plyometric training led to significant improvements in jump performance, sprint performance, and agility for adolescents aged 10 to 19. These results were consistent across all three categories.

How long should an adolescent perform these exercises?

The data suggests that plyometric training is effective for improving jumping, sprinting, and agility when the movements are continued for at least 10 weeks.

Are there any limitations to these findings?

Some results for specific genders or sports were less certain because those smaller groups had limited data. There was also some variation in how different studies tested the athletes.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up228.0 mo
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Plyometric training (PT) is a popular method of improving explosive power, speed, and agility in adolescent athletes. Nevertheless, earlier reviews have been mainly based on individual performance domains, individual sports or general youth groups. It is therefore not clear whether the effects of PT differ based on sex, type of sport, frequency of training or duration of intervention. This meta-analysis and systematic review investigated the impact of PT on jumping, sprinting, and agility performance in adolescents. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from database inception to 1 January 2025, with an updated search on 30 January 2026. Randomized controlled trials that included healthy adolescents aged 10-19 years were included. Conventional random-effects models were used to pool the effects of PT on jumping, sprinting, and agility performance as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for multiple effect sizes contributed by the same study, dependency-adjusted analyses were additionally conducted using three-level random-effects models with CR2 cluster-robust variance estimation. RESULTS: A total of 63 studies were included. Conventional random-effects analyses showed that PT significantly improved jump performance (SMD = 0.648, 95% CI [0.523-0.772];  < 0.001), sprint performance (SMD = -0.496, 95% CI [-0.609 to -0.383];  < 0.001), and agility performance (SMD = -0.659, 95% CI [-0.851 to -0.467];  < 0.001). Dependency-adjusted analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings for jump performance (SMD = 0.613, 95% CI [0.447-0.779];  < 0.001), sprint performance (SMD = -0.414, 95% CI [-0.583 to -0.245];  < 0.001), and agility performance (SMD = -0.595, 95% CI [-0.796 to -0.394];  < 0.001). Benefits were more consistent with longer intervention durations, whereas sex- and sport-specific subgroup findings remained exploratory because of small subgroup sizes and heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: PT seems to be effective in enhancing jumping, sprinting, and agility performance among adolescents, especially when the interventions are continued at least 10 weeks. However, between-study heterogeneity, testing protocol variability, and small sample sizes in some sex- and sport-specific studies limit the generalizability of subgroup results. Future randomized controlled trials should use standardized outcome measures, report training dose and adherence in detail, and have a higher proportion of female participants. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024627316.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.