This prospective, single-center pilot study investigated the feasibility and tolerance of calibrated abdominal compression (ΔSV-AC) as a method to assess fluid responsiveness in critically ill preterm neonates. The cohort consisted of mechanically ventilated and sedated infants under 32 weeks of corrected gestational age who required a 10 mL·kg⁻¹ fluid bolus. A total of 18 fluid boluses were analyzed in this setting within a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.
The primary intervention involved applying calibrated abdominal compression, with standard fluid bolus administration serving as the comparator context. The study assessed the primary outcome of feasibility and tolerance, alongside secondary outcomes including fluid-responsiveness rates and the diagnostic accuracy of ΔSV-AC. Fluid-responsiveness was observed in 8 of the 18 cases (44%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for ΔSV-AC to predict fluid-responsiveness was 0.76 (95% CI 0.43–1).
Safety and tolerability data indicated three cases of transient but significant decreases in stroke volume or heart rate. Two cases were accompanied by a subjective impression of poor tolerance, while all other cases were subjectively rated as well tolerated. No serious adverse events were attributed to the maneuver. However, the study was limited by its exploratory pilot design, uncertainty regarding overall tolerance, and a population mostly suffering from PPHN-related shock etiologies. Diagnostic accuracy requires further characterization, particularly in more common etiologies of neonatal shock.
The practice relevance suggests that calibrated abdominal compression could be feasible in critically ill preterm neonates. Nevertheless, clinicians should interpret these findings cautiously due to the small sample size, the specific shock etiology of the cohort, and the lack of reported follow-up data. Further investigation is necessary to confirm diagnostic utility and safety across diverse neonatal shock populations.
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionPredicting fluid-responsiveness is challenging in preterm neonates. It is however crucial to avoid unnecessary fluid bolus that could lead to fluid overload. In children, stroke volume changes induced by an abdominal compression (ΔSV-AC) can predict fluid responsiveness. This exploratory pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and tolerance of this preload challenge in preterm neonates.Materials and methodsThis prospective, single-center pilot study was conducted in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Mechanically-ventilated and sedated preterm neonates under 32 weeks of corrected gestational age who required a 10 mL.kg−1 fluid bolus were eligible. Stroke volume was measured by echocardiography at baseline, during a gentle abdominal compression, and after the fluid bolus. A ≥15% stroke volume increase after fluid bolus defined fluid-responsiveness. In exploratory analysis, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of ΔSV-AC was measured to predict fluid-responsiveness.ResultsEighteen fluid boluses were analyzed. Fluid-responsiveness was observed in 8 (44%) cases. The calibrated abdominal compression and the echocardiographic measurements were feasible in all cases. Although no serious adverse events were attributed to the maneuver, we observed three cases of transient but significant decreases in stroke volume or heart rate, two of which were accompanied by a subjective impression of poor tolerance. All other cases were subjectively rated as well tolerated. In exploratory analysis, after adjustment for repeated measures, the AUROC of ΔSV-AC to predict fluid-responsiveness was 0.76 (95% CI 0.43–1). The best threshold for ΔSV-AC was 17% with a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.60–1), a sensitivity of 0.51 (95% CI 0.17–1), and positive and negative predictive values of 0.85 (95% CI 0.36–1) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.33–1) respectively.ConclusionsThis study suggests that calibrated abdominal compression could be feasible in a population of critically ill preterm neonates mostly suffering from PPHN-related shock, although its tolerance is uncertain. Further studies are needed to better tailor this maneuver to preterm neonates and to characterize its diagnostic accuracy, including in more common etiologies of neonatal shock.Clinical Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06287710, identifier NCT06287710.