This randomized controlled trial evaluated liquid ondansetron versus a color- and taste-matched placebo in a tertiary pediatric ED in Canada. The population included 91 children aged 6 months to 17 years presenting with more than 3 episodes of vomiting in the preceding 24 hours, including at least one within 2 hours of arrival. Recruitment stopped prematurely due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and the study was underpowered.
The primary outcome measured the proportion of patients requiring observation after the first physician evaluation. Overall, 40 patients (45%) were discharged immediately. The absolute difference between groups was -1% (95% CI: -20% to 19%), indicating no significant difference between ondansetron and placebo groups (44% vs 45%). Secondary outcomes included post-intervention vomiting, ED length of stay, patient comfort, and 48-hour return visits.
Safety data were not reported for adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or tolerability. The study limitations include the premature cessation of recruitment and insufficient power to detect differences. Consequently, the efficacy of ondansetron when initiated at triage remains unclear.
This evidence could inform researchers planning larger clinical trials but does not currently support routine use based on these results.
View Original Abstract ↓
Objectives: Acute gastroenteritis is a leading cause of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. While ondansetron reduces vomiting, intravenous rehydration, and hospital admissions, its efficacy when initiated at triage remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate whether triage nurse-initiated administration of ondansetron in children with suspected gastroenteritis reduces the proportion of patients requiring observation following initial physician assessment. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in a tertiary pediatric ED in Canada. Children aged 6 months to 17 years presenting with morae than 3 episodes of vomiting in the preceding 24 hours (including 1 within 2 hours of arrival), were eligible. At triage, we randomized participants to receive liquid ondansetron or a color- and taste-matched placebo. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients requiring observation after the first physician evaluation. Secondary outcomes included post-intervention vomiting, ED length of stay, patient comfort, and 48-hour return visits. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03052361). Results: Recruitment was stopped prematurely due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Ninety-one participants were randomized to ondansetron (n= 44) or placebo (n= 47). Overall, 40 patients (45%) were discharged immediately after the initial physician assessment, with no difference between the ondansetron and placebo groups (44% vs. 45%; absolute difference -1%, 95% CI: -20% to 19%). No significant differences were observed in all secondary outcomes. Conclusion: In this trial, triage nurse-initiated ondansetron administration did not reduce the need for ED observation in children with presumed gastroenteritis. While being underpowered, this study could inform researchers planning larger clinical trials.