This randomized controlled trial was conducted in high-poverty public elementary schools. The study population consisted of students enrolled in 60 schools, with 30 assigned to treatment and 30 to control. The follow-up period spanned from 2018-19 through 2022-23.
Participants received four book distributions over 5 years, averaging about seven books per distribution. Titles prominently included high-interest and culturally relevant options. The comparator group received no book distributions at all.
The primary outcome measured was reading achievement. The intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated a statistically significant impact with an effect size of 0.100, showing an advantage for treatment. Among students completing the full 5-y program, the advantage persisted with an effect size of 0.207.
Safety data regarding adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported in the study documentation available. Limitations were not reported in the provided data or study documentation provided. The practice relevance suggests a scalable strategy for improving literacy outcomes in high-poverty urban schools. This provides causal evidence supporting skill-development theory. Clinicians may view this as a non-pharmacologic approach to developmental support.
Funding or conflicts of interest were not reported. This lack of information limits the assessment of potential bias. The study design supports causal inference regarding the intervention provided.
View Original Abstract ↓
For more than a century, studies have shown that children who grow up in homes with more books achieve higher levels of academic success, yet it remains unclear whether books themselves improve learning or simply reflect broader socioeconomic advantages. Skill-development theory holds that greater access to books directly improves literacy through increased print exposure and reading practice, whereas the cultural capital account suggests books are indicators of broader family resources, including parental education, academic norms, and enrichment opportunities, that promote achievement independently of the books themselves. To provide causal evidence, we conducted a school-level randomized controlled trial of a program that builds children's home libraries. In 2018, we randomly assigned 60 high-poverty public elementary schools to treatment or control groups. Students in 30 treatment schools received four book distributions over 5 y, averaging about seven books per distribution, and prominently including high-interest and culturally relevant titles; students in 30 control schools received none. Tracking students from 2018-19 through 2022-23, we find a statistically significant intention-to-treat impact on reading achievement of = 0.100 and a larger = 0.207 advantage for those completing the full 5-y program. These impacts correspond to approximately 25 to 32% and 52 to 65% of a typical year's learning, respectively. The largest benefits are concentrated among students who received books across all distributions, indicating that cumulative exposure drives the strongest impacts. These findings provide evidence supporting skill-development theory and highlight a scalable strategy for improving literacy outcomes in high-poverty urban schools.