Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis finds coaching improves teacher practice and child outcomes in early childhood settings

Meta-analysis finds coaching improves teacher practice and child outcomes in early childhood…
Photo by Giorgio Tomassetti / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider coaching as an effective professional learning strategy to improve teacher practice and child outcomes in early childhood settings.

This is a meta-analysis of 112 studies with 918 effect sizes examining coaching as a form of professional learning for teachers in early childhood (EC; 0-8) settings. The review synthesized effects on teacher practice and child outcomes across key content areas, including language and literacy, social-emotional and behavioral development, and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

The authors report positive, medium-to-large effects of EC coaching on these outcomes. No specific effect sizes, confidence intervals, or p-values are provided in the abstract. The review did not identify moderating effects of school and teacher characteristics, and found limited moderation by child characteristics.

A key limitation noted is that this meta-analysis reports associations but does not establish causation. The authors also acknowledge that results are based on pooled effect sizes without specific confidence intervals or p-values reported.

The practice relevance is that coaching is an effective form of professional learning in early childhood settings to promote teachers' use of high-quality practices and children's outcomes. However, the evidence is synthesized from existing studies and should be interpreted with caution.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Coaching is an effective form of professional learning used in early childhood (EC; 0-8) settings to promote teachers' use of high-quality practices and children's outcomes generally. Yet, research on its effectiveness to support key content areas, including language and literacy; social-emotional and behavioral development; and science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, is limited. This meta-analysis examined effects of coaching on teacher practice and child outcomes by content area and potential moderating effects of school, teacher, and child characteristics from 112 studies with 918 effect sizes. Results indicated positive, medium-to-large effects of EC coaching across key content areas on teacher practice and child outcomes. No moderating effects of school and teacher characteristics and limited moderation by child characteristics were identified.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.