Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Mental fatigue reduces resistance exercise volume by moderate effect in healthy adults

Mental fatigue reduces resistance exercise volume by moderate effect in healthy adults
Photo by Gabin Vallet / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that mental fatigue may reduce resistance exercise volume, especially for multijoint and moderate-intensity exercises.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effect of mental fatigue on resistance exercise volume in healthy human participants. The analysis included 205 participants from studies comparing high-demand cognitive tasks (mental fatigue) with low-demand or passive control conditions.

The primary outcome was resistance exercise volume. The pooled effect showed a significant negative effect of mental fatigue (g = -0.39, p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses revealed a significant negative effect for multijoint exercises (g = -0.45, p < 0.01) but a non-significant effect for single-joint exercises (g = -0.20, p = 0.09). The negative effect was also observed across different load intensities: moderate-intensity loads (60%-79% 1RM) showed g = -0.56, low-intensity loads g = -0.40, and bodyweight conditions g = -0.25. For training volume, high-volume conditions had g = -0.54 and moderate-volume conditions g = -0.37.

Limitations include low-quality evidence overall, despite moderate-level evidence per GRADE. The authors note that findings should be interpreted with caution. Adverse events, funding, and practice relevance were not reported.

Clinically, these results suggest that mental fatigue may impair resistance training performance, particularly for multijoint and moderate-to-high intensity exercises. However, the low-quality evidence warrants conservative interpretation.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 205
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The recent increase in randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of mental fatigue (MF) on RE warrants an update of the available meta-analytical evidence. This study presents the results of a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis, including GRADE qualification, examining the effects of MF on RE across different subgroups. We included only randomized controlled trials involving healthy human participants, a high-demand cognitive task requiring cognitive effort (e.g., Stroop test), a low-demand or passive control condition (e.g., watching documentaries), and a resistance exercise performance task assessing volume. A total of 11 studies reported 14 comparisons involving more than 205 participants, providing moderate-level evidence. The random-effects meta-analysis revealed a significant mean negative effect of cognitive effort on RE volume (g = -0.39 and p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses suggested that multijoint exercises may be more susceptible to impairment (g = -0.45 and p < 0.01) than single-joint exercises (g = -0.20 and p = 0.09). The magnitude of impairment appeared larger at moderate-intensity loads (60%-79% 1RM and g = -0.56) relative to low-intensity (g = -0.40) and bodyweight conditions (g = -0.25). Similarly, the effect appeared greater in high training volume conditions (g = -0.54) compared to moderate volume (g = -0.37). Overall, although this review confirms the negative impact of MF on RE volume, the findings should be interpreted with caution due to low-quality evidence.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.