Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Home-based upper limb exercise shows no benefit over lower limb exercise for shoulder function in older adultsHome arm exercises did not improve shoulder function in older adults compared to leg workouts

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that home-based upper limb exercise did not improve function versus lower limb exercise in older adults.

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a home-based exercise program targeting upper limb strength, mobility, and function in community-dwelling people aged 65 years and older. The comparator was a home-based exercise program targeting lower limb balance and strength. A total of 617 participants were included in the analysis, with 462 providing data for the primary outcome assessment.

The primary outcome measured upper limb function using the self-report Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. At 12 months, no clinically important or statistically significant between-group difference was detected. The mean difference (MD) was 0.99 with a 95% CI of -0.82 to 2.79 and a p value of 0.283. Secondary outcomes included shoulder strength, range of motion, quality of life, and physical activity. No significant between-group differences were found for these measures.

Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported in the study. The authors noted that more research is needed to determine the optimal exercise protocols for prevention of shoulder dysfunction. Funding sources and conflicts of interest were not reported.

In practice, people aged 65+ can successfully learn and adhere to a home-based exercise program for the upper limb with instruction provided in a group setting. However, this program did not improve upper limb strength, mobility, and function compared to the lower limb exercise intervention.

This randomized controlled trial involved 617 community-dwelling people aged 65 years and older. Participants were assigned to either a home-based exercise program targeting upper limb strength and mobility or a program focusing on lower limb balance and strength. The study took place in a home-based setting.

After 12 months, researchers found no clinically important or statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding upper limb function. This primary outcome was measured using the self-report Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Secondary outcomes such as shoulder strength, range of motion, quality of life, and physical activity also showed no significant differences between the groups.

There were no reported adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, or issues with tolerability. While the study confirms that older adults can learn and adhere to home-based exercise programs when instruction is provided in a group setting, it did not show that these specific arm exercises improved strength or function compared to leg exercises. More research is needed to determine the optimal exercise protocols for preventing shoulder dysfunction.

What this means for you:
Home arm exercises did not improve shoulder function in older adults compared to leg exercises in this trial.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 617
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up780.0 mo
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Upper limb dysfunction, including shoulder pain, is a major health issue for older people. Exercise is commonly used to treat shoulder disorders. This study aimed to determine the effect of a home-based upper limb exercise program on upper limb function compared to a lower limb exercise program, among community-dwelling people aged 65 years + . METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted. One group received a home-based exercise program targeting upper limb (UL) strength, mobility and function. The other group received a home-based exercise program targeting lower limb (LL) balance and strength. Both exercise programs were taught at three group-based sessions in weeks 1, 4 and 12 post-randomization. Participants were requested to complete exercises three times per week for 12 months. The primary outcome was UL function, measured with the self-report Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM), quality of life (QOL) and physical activity. RESULTS: 617 participants were randomly assigned to UL (n = 307) or LL (n = 310) groups. Mean age was 73 years, (SD 6.0) and 64% were female. No clinically important or statistically significant between-group difference was detected in UL function (measured by the DASH) at 12 months (mean difference (MD) = 0.99, 95% CI -0.82 to 2.79, p = 0.283, n = 462). There were no significant between-group differences in shoulder ROM, most measures of strength, physical activity (device-measured and self-report), QOL and UL function at three and six months. Participants performed the exercises twice per week, averaging 104 exercise sessions (SD 69, median 117, range 0-371) over the 12-month intervention period. CONCLUSION: People aged 65 + can successfully learn and adhere to a home-based exercise program for the UL with instruction provided in a group setting, however this program did not improve UL strength, mobility and function. Considering the increased rates of shoulder dysfunction in older age, more research is needed to determine the optimal exercise protocols for prevention of shoulder dysfunction.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.