Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for lumbar degenerative disc disease surgery patients

Systematic review and meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions for lumbar degenerative disc dis…
Photo by Vitaly Gariev / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Note low certainty of evidence and high risk of bias in this meta-analysis of rehabilitation interventions.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examines rehabilitation and behavior change interventions, including exercise, supervised exercise, psychologically informed rehabilitation, physical activity advice, and prehabilitation, for adults with lumbar degenerative disc disease who underwent lumbar surgery. The scope covers immediate and intermediate term follow-up periods, comparing these interventions against minimal or usual care. The primary outcomes assessed were physical capacity and physical activity behavior, with no secondary outcomes reported.

Key synthesized findings show that exercise was more effective than minimal or usual care for trunk extension endurance, with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 1.54 (95% CI, 0.93-2.16). Supervised exercise outperformed self-directed exercise for this outcome, with an SMD of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.75-1.81). Regarding physical activity levels, psychologically informed rehabilitation was more effective than minimal or usual care at intermediate term (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.02-0.49) but not at immediate term (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.49). Physical activity advice did not increase physical activity levels compared to minimal or usual care at immediate term (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.55). Prehabilitation was more effective than minimal or usual care at intermediate term (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.03-0.53).

Safety data, including adverse events, serious adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability, were not reported. The authors note limitations including low certainty of evidence and high risk of bias. Consequently, the certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. Due to these limitations, the findings should be interpreted with caution regarding clinical practice relevance.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJan 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation and behavior change interventions are commonly used after lumbar surgery to improve recovery, but their effects on physical capacity and physical activity remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of rehabilitation and behavior change interventions on physical capacity and physical activity behavior in patients following lumbar surgery for degenerative disease. METHODS: EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to September 2025 and reference lists were hand-searched. Randomized controlled trials assessing rehabilitation or behavior change interventions on physical capacity or physical activity behavior in adults with lumbar degenerative disc disease who underwent lumbar surgery were included. Review author pairs independently extracted data and assessed included studies. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool, and study quality with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation classification. Results were pooled using random-effects models and reported as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Exercise was more effective than minimal or usual care in improving trunk extension endurance in the immediate term (SMD, 1.54; 95% CI, 0.93-2.16). Supervised exercise outperformed self-directed exercise in improving trunk extension endurance in the immediate term (SMD, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.75-1.81). Psychologically informed rehabilitation was more effective than minimal or usual care in increasing physical activity levels in the intermediate term (SMD, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.02-0.49), but not in the immediate term (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.14 to 0.49). Physical activity advice did not increase physical activity levels compared to minimal or usual care in the immediate term (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.55). Prehabilitation was more effective than minimal or usual care in increasing physical activity levels in the intermediate term (SMD, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.03-0.53). Certainty of evidence ranged from low to moderate. CONCLUSIONS: For adults with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent lumbar surgery, exercise, especially supervised programs, improved trunk extension endurance in the immediate term. Psychologically informed rehabilitation and prehabilitation increased physical activity levels in the intermediate term, while physical activity advice showed no benefit. Findings are limited by low certainty of evidence and high risk of bias.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.