Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Transition period between hamstring contractions does not differ after injuryHamstring injury history does not change transition period between muscle contractions

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that the transition period between eccentric and concentric hamstring contractions may not be a useful marker for prior hamstring injury.

This observational retrospective study (Level of evidence: 3b) included 57 participants: 26 athletes with a history of hamstring injury and 31 healthy controls. Researchers used isokinetic dynamometry to assess the transition period between eccentric (30°/s) and concentric (240°/s) hamstring contractions, as well as other strength parameters.

The primary outcome, the transition period, did not differ significantly between groups. However, concentric hamstring peak torque at 240°/s was higher in injured athletes (p = 0.002), and concentric peak torque at 60°/s was also higher in injured athletes (p = 0.013). Eccentric torque was similar between injured and uninjured limbs. No correlation was found between the transition period and other parameters.

Safety and tolerability were not reported. Limitations include that the transition period may lack clinical utility in guiding rehabilitation, and future studies using electrophysiological techniques could provide more precise insight.

Practice relevance: The transition period does not appear to be influenced by a prior hamstring injury, and its clinical utility is uncertain. Plyometric evaluation may help reveal residual eccentric deficits.

This research looked at how the hamstring muscle behaves when switching from lengthening to shortening movements. The team compared 26 athletes with a past hamstring injury to 31 healthy controls. They used a machine to measure the transition period between these different types of muscle contractions. They also checked peak strength at various speeds and the relationship between different strength measures.

The results showed that the transition period was similar in both groups. Injured athletes actually showed higher peak torque at certain speeds compared to healthy controls. There was no link found between the transition period and other strength parameters. The study also found no difference in pure lengthening strength between the injured and uninjured limbs.

The researchers noted that this specific transition measure might not be useful for guiding rehabilitation plans. They suggested that other tests, like plyometric evaluations, might be better at finding remaining weakness. Because this was a small study with limited data, the findings should be viewed as preliminary. More research using advanced electrical techniques could provide clearer answers in the future.

What this means for you:
Past hamstring injury does not appear to change how quickly the muscle switches between shortening and lengthening.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundHamstring (Hs) injuries are frequent in sports involving explosive efforts. While eccentric deficits and strength imbalances are known risk factors, the role of the transition period between eccentric and concentric contractions remains unexplored.ObjectiveTo determine whether the transition period between eccentric and concentric contractions of the hamstrings, measured using an isokinetic dynamometer, differs between athletes with a history of Hs injury and healthy controls.MethodsThis observational retrospective study included 57 participants (26 previously injured athletes and 31 healthy controls) assessed with standard and plyometric isokinetic tests. The primary outcome was the transition period between eccentric (30°/s) and concentric (240°/s) Hs contractions. Secondary outcomes included torque measurements and calculated ratios (Croisier and Plyometric).ResultsThe transition period did not differ significantly between groups. Injured athletes demonstrated higher concentric Hs peak torque at 240°/s (p = 0.002) and 60°/s (p = 0.013), but similar eccentric torque. No differences were found between injured and uninjured limbs in the injured group. The transition period showed no correlation with other isokinetic or anthropometric parameters.ConclusionThe transition period, as measured by isokinetic testing, does not appear to be influenced by a prior Hs injury and may lack clinical utility in guiding rehabilitation. However, plyometric evaluation may help reveal residual eccentric deficits in previously injured athletes. Future studies using electrophysiological techniques could provide more precise insight into neuromuscular latency during explosive efforts.Levels of evidence: 3b
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.