Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Cluster resistance training yields better affective responses than traditional protocols in young adultsCluster Sets Boost Enjoyment and Lower Perceived Effort

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider that cluster resistance training may enhance acute enjoyment and reduce perceived exertion compared to traditional protocols.

The trial utilized a randomized crossover design to examine acute effects of different resistance training set configurations. Participants were resistance-trained young adults who underwent both a cluster resistance training protocol and a traditional resistance training protocol. The primary focus was on affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion during and after the sessions.

Results indicated that affective valence declined during and after the traditional session but remained stable in the cluster session. Perceived activation increased in both conditions, yet it was significantly higher after the traditional protocol. Conversely, enjoyment was significantly greater following the cluster session, and rating of perceived exertion was significantly lower. A negative correlation was observed between perceived exertion and enjoyment or affective valence.

The authors note that while no adverse events were reported, the study has a small sample size and focuses on acute effects rather than long-term outcomes. The trial reported that cluster resistance training elicits more favorable affective and perceptual responses. This may enhance exercise enjoyment and potentially support long-term adherence, but clinicians should interpret these findings with caution regarding immediate session effects.

A small study of 16 resistance-trained young adults compared two ways of doing resistance training: cluster sets (short rests between reps) and traditional sets (all reps in a row). The researchers measured how people felt during and after each session, including mood, energy, enjoyment, and how hard the workout seemed.

They found that during traditional sets, people's mood dropped and they felt more drained. But with cluster sets, mood stayed steady and people reported higher enjoyment and lower perceived effort. The difference was large enough to be meaningful, with effect sizes ranging from 0.7 to 1.2.

This was an acute study, meaning it only looked at one session. It did not track long-term effects or whether cluster sets lead to better workout habits over time. No safety issues were reported, but the study was too small to draw broad conclusions.

The takeaway is that how you structure your rest during weight training can change how you feel in the moment. Cluster sets might make workouts more enjoyable and less grueling, which could help some people stick with their routine.

What this means for you:
Cluster sets may make resistance training feel easier and more enjoyable than traditional sets.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
de Souza Soares, B, Mohammad, J, Cantelmo, CE, Gomes Alves, MC, de Oliveira Barros, BC, and Vieira de Oliveira, G. Feelings in the lift: Comparing perceptual responses to cluster and traditional resistance training protocols. J Strength Cond Res 40(5): e437-e444, 2026-This study compared the acute effects of traditional vs. cluster resistance training (RT) protocols on affective valence, arousal, enjoyment, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in resistance-trained young adults. Sixteen subjects completed 2 lower-limb RT sessions in a randomized crossover design: 1 with a traditional configuration and another with cluster sets. Affective valence declined during and after the traditional session ( p < 0.05), but remained stable across time in the cluster session, with a significant protocol × time interaction ( p < 0.001). Perceived activation increased in both conditions ( p < 0.001) but was significantly higher after the traditional protocol ( p = 0.04; d = 0.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.12-1.21]). Enjoyment was significantly greater ( p < 0.01; d = 0.7, 95% CI [-1.31 to -0.18]), and RPE significantly lower ( p < 0.001; d = 1.2, 95% CI [0.52-1.82]) following the cluster session. Rating of perceived exertion negatively correlated with enjoyment ( r = -0.54, p = 0.03) and affective valence ( r = -0.54, p = 0.032) in the traditional condition. These results suggest that RT set configuration acutely modulates psychoaffective outcomes. Cluster RT elicits more favorable affective and perceptual responses, which may enhance exercise enjoyment and support long-term adherence.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.