Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Systematic review finds shockwave therapy offers no consistent benefit for Achilles tendinopathy compared to controls

Systematic review finds shockwave therapy offers no consistent benefit for Achilles tendinopathy com…
Photo by CDC / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider prioritizing alternative treatments over shockwave therapy for Achilles tendinopathy given low-certainty evidence of benefit.

This systematic review with meta-analysis examines the efficacy of shockwave therapy for insertional and midportion Achilles tendinopathy in adults. The review included 557 participants and compared radial or focused SWT with or without co-interventions against sham-SWT, no treatment, or wait-and-see controls. Follow-up assessments covered short- and long-term outcomes.

The analysis found no clinically meaningful benefit over sham for insertional Achilles tendinopathy. For midportion Achilles tendinopathy, there were no significant differences in disability or pain between SWT and control interventions at all timepoints. However, one trial did report a benefit over sham-SWT for midportion cases. The evidence for radial SWT in midportion cases showed very low-certainty evidence of a clinically meaningful effect on improvements in disability and pain compared to sham or wait-and-see controls.

Safety concerns were noted as two Achilles tendon ruptures were reported following focused SWT. Most effect estimates are based on very low- and low-certainty data. One trial did not report success of participant blinding. The authors state that true effects may change with future high-quality trials.

The review concludes that SWT should not be considered a routine treatment for either insertional or midportion Achilles tendinopathy, and alternative treatments should be prioritized.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
Sample sizen = 557
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
To evaluate the effects of shockwave therapy (SWT) for Achilles tendinopathy compared to sham-SWT as a monotherapy or co-intervention or no treatment. Intervention systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). AMED, CINAHL, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane CENTRAL, clinical trial registries, and gray literature were searched between February 14 and February 24, 2025. Criteria included RCTs assessing radial or focused SWT (with or without co-interventions) in adults with Achilles tendinopathy. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. Nine RCTs (n = 557) were included. For insertional Achilles tendinopathy, SWT showed no clinically meaningful benefit over sham (low-moderate certainty), with consistent findings across all outcomes and sensitivity/subgroup analyses. For midportion Achilles tendinopathy, all meta-analyses (very low and moderate certainty) showed no significant differences in disability or pain between SWT and control interventions at all timepoints. There was very low-certainty evidence of a clinically meaningful effect of radial SWT on short- and long-term improvements in disability and pain compared to sham or wait-and-see controls. One trial (midportion Achilles tendinopathy) showed benefit over sham-SWT but did not report success of participant blinding. Subgroup analyses revealed no clear advantage for either radial or focused SWT. Two Achilles tendon ruptures were reported following focused SWT. There was no clinically meaningful benefit of SWT in pain and disability for Achilles tendinopathy, with evidence ranging from very low to moderate certainty. Because most effect estimates are based on very low- and low-certainty data, the true effects may change with future high-quality trials. At present, SWT should not be considered a routine treatment for either insertional or midportion Achilles tendinopathy, and alternative treatments should be prioritized. .
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.