Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

WNV-neutralizing plasma did not reduce death or functional decline in hospitalized older patientsCould blood plasma help older adults survive West Nile virus, or is it just a hopeful idea?

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Interpret functional and cognitive score improvements cautiously; primary outcome was not met.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 34 hospitalized patients in Israel with laboratory-confirmed symptomatic West Nile virus disease who were either aged 60 years or older or immunocompromised. Participants were randomized to receive donor-derived WNV-neutralizing plasma or placebo. The primary composite outcome of all-cause mortality or functional deterioration (a decrease of more than 5 points on the Barthel Index) at 30 days showed no difference: 11 of 22 (50%) in the intervention group versus 6 of 12 (50%) in the placebo group (risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.51-1.79).

Secondary outcomes showed a non-significant trend toward lower mortality in the intervention group (2 of 22 vs. 4 of 12; risk ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.09-1.15). Functional capacity (Barthel Index) and cognitive scores (Modified Mini-Mental State Examination) at 30 days were higher in the intervention group, with risk ratios of 1.15 (95% CI 1.05-1.27) and 1.24 (95% CI 1.04-1.47), respectively.

One allergic reaction (4.5%) was reported in the intervention group; serious adverse events and tolerability were not reported. Key limitations include the very small sample size and that 91% of participants had severe neuroinvasive disease at enrollment, limiting generalizability. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint, and the mortality finding is inconclusive due to the wide confidence interval. This evidence is insufficient to recommend WNV-neutralizing plasma for hospitalized patients.

Imagine being hospitalized with a severe West Nile virus infection. You are older or have a weakened immune system, making the illness very dangerous. Doctors in Israel tested a new treatment during a 2024 outbreak. They gave some patients blood plasma containing antibodies that fight the virus, while others received a placebo. The goal was to stop patients from dying or losing their ability to perform daily tasks like walking or eating.

After 30 days, the group receiving the plasma did not show a clear reduction in the main risk of death or functional decline. However, there were encouraging signs. Fewer people in the plasma group died, and those who received it scored slightly higher on tests measuring their ability to function and their mental clarity. These improvements suggest the treatment might work, but the numbers are not large enough to be certain.

The study involved only 34 patients, most of whom had severe brain or nerve involvement. This small size makes the results uncertain. While the plasma seemed safe with only one mild allergic reaction, we cannot say for sure if it saves lives yet. The wide range of possible outcomes means we must wait for larger studies before changing how we treat these vulnerable patients.

What this means for you:
Small study hints plasma may help function but does not prove it saves lives yet.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 34
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up720.0 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: In 2024, Israel faced a major West Nile virus (WNV) disease outbreak. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of WNV-neutralizing plasma for hospitalized patients with WNV disease. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed symptomatic WNV disease, 60 years of age or older, or 18 to 59 years of age and immunocompromised, were eligible. Participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to donor-derived WNV-neutralizing plasma or placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and any functional deterioration at 30 days, defined as a decrease of more than 5 points from baseline on the Barthel Index (range 0-100; higher scores indicate greater independence) for activities of daily living (i.e., failure to return to pre-illness functional status). Key secondary outcomes included mortality, functional capacity (Barthel Index), and cognitive score (Modified Mini-Mental State Examination; range 0-30; higher scores indicate higher cognitive ability) at 30 and 90 days. RESULTS: Of the 34 participants enrolled, 22 were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 12 to placebo. Median age was 74 (interquartile range, 64-82), 50% were women, and 91% had neuroinvasive disease at enrollment. At 30 days, 11/22 (50%) and 6/12 (50%) patients in the treatment and placebo group, respectively, died or had functional deterioration (risk ratio [RR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.79). Two patients (2/22) died in the intervention group, compared with 4 (4/12) in the placebo group (RR, 0.33, 95% CI, 0.09-1.15). The intervention was associated with higher functional capacity (Barthel Index 85 in the intervention group vs. 78 in the placebo group; RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.27), and higher cognitive scores (Mini-Mental score 25 vs. 22; RR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47) at 30 days. One (4.5%) allergic reaction was observed in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, randomized trial of predominantly severe neuroinvasive WNV, treatment with WNV-neutralizing plasma did not reduce the composite outcome of death or functional deterioration at 30 days compared to placebo. It was associated with improved cognitive and functional outcomes. Potential differences in mortality warrant further evaluation. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT06590207.).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.