Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Cluster set resistance training reduced acute fatigue compared to traditional sets in resistance-trained adults.

Cluster set resistance training reduced acute fatigue compared to traditional sets in resistance-tra…
Photo by HamZa NOUASRIA / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider cluster sets to reduce acute fatigue and maintain velocity during resistance training sessions.

A randomized controlled trial involving 36 resistance-trained males and females compared cluster set (CS) resistance training against traditional set (TS) resistance training. The study setting was not reported, and the follow-up period lasted 1.4 months. Secondary outcomes included acute responses such as blood lactate, mean propulsive velocity, velocity loss, countermovement jump height, modified reactive strength index, rating of perceived exertion, delayed onset muscle soreness, and short recovery and stress scale. Chronic adaptations assessed included 1RM, relative isometric peak force, muscle endurance, CMJ height, velocity at 70% 1RM, and load-velocity profiling.

regarding acute fatigue, cluster sets displayed higher barbell velocities and lower fatigue compared to traditional sets. Specifically, velocity loss showed effect sizes ranging from g = -0.56 to -2.16 favoring CS. Blood lactate levels were lower with CS (g = -0.51 to -1.86), and rating of perceived exertion was reduced (g = -0.91). In contrast, chronic adaptations for 1RM showed comparable improvements between groups, with effect sizes of g = 0.28 for CS and g = 0.23 for TS. Similarly, muscle endurance improvements were comparable (CS: g = 0.48; TS: g = 0.50), and velocity at 70% 1RM showed similar gains (CS: g = 1.18; TS: g = 1.32).

No significant improvements were observed for CMJ height or isometric peak force, as effect sizes were not reported for these outcomes. Load-velocity profiling demonstrated distinct adaptations, with CS showing a shallower slope. Safety data indicated no reported adverse events. The study limitations include the small sample size of 36 participants and the lack of reported primary outcomes or specific setting details. These results suggest that cluster sets may offer benefits for managing acute fatigue and maintaining velocity during resistance training sessions, though further research is needed to confirm these findings in broader populations.

Study Details

Study typeRct
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up1.4 mo
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
This study compared acute and chronic adaptations to cluster set (CS) and traditional set (TS) structures during a 6-week linear periodised resistance training programme in the back squat. Thirty-six resistance-trained females and males were randomly assigned to the CS or the TS group. Acute responses were assessed using objective (blood lactate, mean propulsive velocity, velocity loss [VL], countermovement jump [CMJ] height and modified reactive strength index) and subjective measures (rating of perceived exertion [RPE], delayed onset muscle soreness and the short recovery and stress scale). Chronic adaptations included one-repetition maximum (1RM), relative isometric peak force, muscle endurance, CMJ height, velocity at 70% 1RM (v70) and load-velocity (L-V) profiling. CS displayed higher barbell velocities and lower acute fatigue, reflected by VL (g = -0.56 to -2.16), lactate (g = -0.51 to -1.86) and RPE (g = -0.91). TS did not demonstrate lower fatigue in any acute measure. Both protocols elicited comparable improvements in 1RM (CS: g = 0.28; TS: g = 0.23), muscle endurance (CS: g = 0.48; TS: g = 0.50) and v70 (CS: g = 1.18; TS: g = 1.32), with no significant improvements in CMJ height or isometric peak force. Post-intervention L-V profiling revealed distinct adaptations, with CS demonstrating a shallower slope, indicating higher velocities at heavier loads. Sex differences were minimal; females displayed lower lactate and RPE, while longitudinal adaptations were similar. In conclusion, both protocols improved muscle strength and endurance. Collectively, CS provided superior fatigue management, better preservation of barbell velocity and unique L-V profile adaptations.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.