Modular Footwear Setup Validated for Biomechanical Testing in 10 Healthy Adults
This methodological validation study evaluated a Modular Footwear Setup (MFS) designed to test isolated biomechanical effects of footwear features. The study involved 10 healthy participants (5 male, 5 female) who wore both the MFS and a standard control shoe with the same upper and midsole. The primary outcome was the accuracy and repeatability of the MFS in replicating biomechanical outcomes of the control shoe.
For joint kinematics, Statistical Parametric Mapping analysis identified no significant differences between the MFS and control shoe. In-shoe plantar pressure measurements showed the MFS exhibited slightly lower peak pressure at the rearfoot, while pressure parameters in other foot regions were not statistically different. The inter-session repeatability of peak and mean pressure for the MFS was good-to-excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.84 to 0.97. Participant-reported comfort and stability were similar between the two footwear conditions.
Safety and tolerability data were not reported. The study's key limitations include the small sample size of healthy participants and the absence of testing for specific therapeutic outcomes or clinical efficacy. The findings are specific to validating a testing tool rather than demonstrating effects of specific footwear features on health outcomes. While the MFS shows potential as a reliable platform for footwear research, its direct relevance to clinical practice requires further investigation in patient populations and with specific therapeutic interventions.