Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Maternal RSVpreF vaccination provides 79.7% effectiveness against infant RSV-associated hospitalization within 3 monthsMaternal vaccine shows promise in protecting infants from RSV infections

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that maternal RSVpreF vaccination provides substantial protection against infant RSV-associated hospitalization.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the impact of maternal RSVpreF vaccination on infant outcomes related to Respiratory Syncytial Virus. The analysis included approximately 18,600 pregnant women from randomized trials and 15 observational studies. The authors synthesized data showing that maternal vaccination provides substantial protection against infant disease, with a 79.7% effectiveness against RSV-associated hospitalization within 3 months (95% CI 73.9-84.2) and 68.1% effectiveness through 6 months (95% CI 57.1-76.3). Additionally, the licensed Pfizer vaccine showed 70% efficacy against severe RSV-LRTI and 51.5% efficacy against medically attended RSV-LRTI (95% CI 36.3-63.1).

Regarding safety, no other maternal or neonatal safety signals were identified. The authors noted a conflicting signal for preterm birth: randomized trials showed a modest increase (1.17; 95% CI 1.03-1.32), but this was not robustly significant for the licensed Pfizer vaccine. Conversely, observational data suggested a protective association (0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.99), though the authors noted this was likely due to healthy vaccinee confounding.

Clinical evidence for vaccine effectiveness and efficacy is of moderate certainty. The results suggest that maternal RSVpreF vaccination provides substantial protection against infant RSV disease. While a preterm birth signal was observed in some trials, it was not robustly significant for the licensed vaccine, and the observational protective association is considered biologically implausible.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus, or RSV, can cause serious lung infections in babies. New data suggests that a specific vaccine given to pregnant women may offer a shield for their infants. The study looked at data from about 18,600 pregnant women to see how well the vaccine protected babies from severe respiratory issues.

The results show the vaccine was quite effective. It showed a 79.7% success rate in preventing infants from being hospitalized for RSV within three months. Even looking at a longer window of six months, the protection remained high at 68.1%. For babies needing medical care for RSV, the vaccine showed a 51.5% effectiveness rate.

There was some mixed information regarding early births. While one type of study showed a small increase in preterm births, this finding was not consistent across all data. Specifically, the licensed Pfizer vaccine did not show a significant link to early births. No other safety concerns for mothers or babies were found, making it a promising option for protecting newborns.

What this means for you:
A vaccine for pregnant women can significantly reduce the risk of infants being hospitalized for RSV infections.

Common questions

How well does the vaccine protect infants from RSV?

The vaccine showed a 79.7% effectiveness rate in preventing infants from being hospitalized for RSV within three months of birth. For a six-month window, the protection rate was 68.1%. It also showed a 51.5% effectiveness rate against RSV infections that required medical attention.

Is the vaccine safe for pregnant women and their babies?

No other maternal or neonatal safety signals were identified in the study. While some data showed a slight increase in preterm births in certain trials, this was not a robust finding for the licensed Pfizer vaccine. You should speak with your doctor to discuss the best options for your pregnancy.

What is the difference between the different types of results found?

The study looked at both randomized trials and observational data. The results for the licensed Pfizer vaccine showed 70% efficacy against severe RSV infections. The data also showed that the results from real-world use were very similar to the results found in controlled trials.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of infant lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and hospitalisation worldwide. Maternal RSV prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccination protects infants through transplacental antibody transfer. We aimed to synthesise the efficacy, real-world effectiveness, and safety of maternal RSV vaccination for preventing infant LRTI, integrating randomised and observational evidence.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL (to June 2026) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of maternal RSV vaccination reporting infant LRTI, hospitalisation, or maternal–infant safety. A single reviewer, with large language model-assisted verification, screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB 2; Newcastle–Ottawa Scale). Randomised and observational evidence were pooled separately using random-effects models; overlapping populations were resolved based on study periods and named participating sites. Certainty was rated with GRADE (PROSPERO CRD420261400053).ResultsTwenty-four studies (9 RCTs enrolling approximately 18,600 pregnant women, 15 observational) were included; all 15 observational studies evaluated the licensed Pfizer vaccine (Abrysvo). Pooled vaccine effectiveness against infant RSV-associated hospitalisation was 79.7% (95% CI 73.9–84.2) within 3 months and 68.1% (57.1–76.3) through 6 months. Randomised efficacy against severe RSV-LRTI was 70% for the licensed Pfizer vaccine, closely concordant with the real-world effectiveness; efficacy against medically attended RSV-LRTI was 51.5% (36.3–63.1). Preterm birth was modestly increased in the randomised trials (Mantel–Haenszel RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03–1.32), but the signal was not robust: it became non-significant after excluding the GSK trial (GRACE; 1.10, 0.95–1.27), and for the licensed Pfizer vaccine, the increase was small and not robustly significant (pivotal MATISSE trial 1.20, 0.98–1.46; three-trial Pfizer pool 1.21, 1.00–1.46), while observational data showed a biologically implausible protective association (0.90, 0.82–0.99), consistent with healthy vaccinee confounding. No other maternal or neonatal safety signal was identified. Certainty of evidence was moderate for effectiveness and efficacy.ConclusionMaternal RSVpreF vaccination confers substantial, generalisable protection against infant RSV disease, with randomised and real-world evidence in close agreement. For the licensed Pfizer vaccine administered within its approved 32–36-week window, no robustly significant increase in preterm birth is established, supporting its continued programmatic use alongside ongoing post-marketing surveillance.Systematic review registrationUnique Identifier: CRD420261400053 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261400053
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.