Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Arts-inclusive programs show preliminary promise for children's mental health in non-clinical settingsArts programs show early promise for children's mental health

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that while arts-inclusive therapeutic approaches show promise, evidence certainty remains low for children's mental health.

This systematic review synthesized findings from 34 studies evaluating the impact of arts-inclusive programs and recreational activities on mental health and wellbeing in children aged 6 to 12 years. The scope included therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings led by specialists over short durations (typically 4 to 10 weeks) and broader recreational programs.

The review found preliminary signs of promise for therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings. However, results regarding recreational programs were inconsistent; some studies reported benefits for wellbeing and stress while others showed no effect. Regarding internalizing or externalizing symptoms, some studies reported no effect from recreational programs.

A primary limitation noted by the authors is that the certainty of evidence across all mental health outcomes was rated as low or very low. These findings suggest a need for higher quality studies in school contexts to better evaluate pedagogical design and facilitator expertise. Clinical application remains preliminary due to inconsistent results and low evidence certainty.

How this fits prior evidence

This systematic review addresses a gap in understanding non-clinical interventions for pediatric mental health. While prior coverage noted the severe lack of high-quality empirical data and evidence-based interventions for fisherman mental health, this review focuses on children aged 6 to 12. It provides preliminary evidence for arts-inclusive programs as potentially scalable approaches, though it does not directly relate to the findings regarding screening tools in sub-Saharan Africa or maternal mental health impacts.

Supporting the mental health of children is a major challenge. For kids between the ages of 6 and 12, finding accessible ways to manage stress and improve well-being is vital for their development. Researchers looked at how arts-inclusive programs and recreational activities might help.

The review of 34 studies found that short-term therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings showed preliminary signs of promise. These were led by specialists and lasted about 4 to 10 weeks. When it came to general recreational programs, the results for well-being and stress were inconsistent; some studies saw benefits while others did not.

It is important to note that the evidence for these outcomes is currently rated as low or very low certainty. While these programs offer a potentially scalable way to reach more children, more high-quality research is needed to understand how specific teaching methods and expert guidance impact results.

What this means for you:
Short-term arts-based therapy shows early promise for kids' mental health, but more high-quality research is needed.

Common questions

Can art programs help kids with mental health?

Short-term therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings led by specialists showed preliminary signs of promise for mental health and well-being. These programs typically lasted between 4 and 10 weeks. However, the certainty of this evidence is currently rated as low or very low.

Do recreational art programs help with stress?

The results for recreational programs regarding well-being and stress were inconsistent. While some studies reported benefits, other studies showed no effect at all. Because the evidence is not yet certain, talk to a professional about specific needs.

What are the limitations of these findings?

The certainty of evidence across all mental health outcomes was rated as low or very low. More high-quality studies are needed, especially in school settings, to see how teacher expertise and specific program designs affect children's well-being.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Arts-based programs have re-emerged as a focus of population mental health policy, with the World Health Organisation Healing Arts initiative and social prescribing programs across the UK, Australia, USA, and Canada signaling growing interest in scalable, accessible approaches to mental health prevention. With this growing trend there is an opportunity for seeking complementary scalable approaches implemented during childhood to prevent mental-ill health. The aim of this study was to provide a broad overview of the nature of the relationships between participation in arts programs and mental health and wellbeing outcomes during middle childhood, with a specific emphasis on the mechanisms that may underlie this relationship. This review also aimed to identify program characteristics and the context in which this relationship exists. This systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines with a focus on studies examining the relationships between arts participation and mental health and wellbeing outcomes among children in the general population during the middle childhood years (6 to 12 years). A total of 34 studies were included, made up of primarily quantitative studies. The evidence base reviewed suggests therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings led by specialists over shorter periods of implementation (typically 4–10 weeks) shows preliminary signs of promise. Recreational programs showed inconsistent effects across outcome domains: some studies reported benefits to wellbeing and stress, while others reported no effect on internalising or externalising symptoms, with no consistent pattern across program features. Psychological and biological constructs were the most commonly identified mechanisms of change. The certainty of evidence across all mental health outcomes was rated as low or very low. This first systematic review of arts-inclusive programs in middle childhood points to preliminary signs of promise, particularly for therapeutic approaches in non-clinical settings, although the certainty of evidence is low. Future research should focus on conducting high quality studies in school contexts with a focus on pedagogical design and facilitator expertise. This would address cost effectiveness for scaling at the general population level for prevention. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024581364.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.