Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Expert consensus establishes 16 curriculum components and 6 pedagogical principles for person-centred leadership trainingExperts agree on new training standards for person-centered leadership

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Use the established 16-component curriculum framework to ensure consistency in person-centred leadership training.

This guideline, developed through a Delphi study involving international experts, establishes a framework for person-centred leadership programs. The scope focuses on defining core curriculum components and pedagogical delivery principles to standardize training in this area.

In Round 1, experts reached consensus of ≥70% for all 16 curriculum components and 6 pedagogical delivery principles, with nearly all achieving ≥80%. In Round 2, a higher consensus of ≥80% was achieved for all curriculum components. These findings provide a structured foundation for designing leadership training.

A primary limitation noted is the lack of high-quality, multi-centre evaluations regarding the actual effectiveness or impact of person-centred leadership programs on clinical outcomes. The study focuses on framework construction rather than outcome measurement.

Clinically, this framework provides an internationally critiqued curriculum to ensure fidelity in future studies. It serves as a standardized tool for educational design, though its direct effect on patient care is not yet established by the current evidence.

Leading healthcare and service providers often struggle with how to train staff to be truly person-centered. This means focusing on the individual's unique needs rather than just following a standard procedure. To solve this, international experts gathered to build a solid framework for leadership training.

The group reached a strong consensus on 16 specific curriculum components and 6 ways to teach these skills effectively. By establishing these clear standards, organizations can ensure their training programs are consistent and high-quality. This helps leaders stay focused on the human side of care and management.

While this study provides a solid roadmap for training, it is important to note that it does not measure how these programs change patient outcomes yet. Because there aren't many large studies testing the impact of these specific curriculums in different locations, the results are currently focused on building the best possible framework for future use.

What this means for you:
Experts established a standardized framework to help train leaders in person-centered care and management.

Common questions

What is being taught in these new leadership programs?

The program focuses on 16 specific curriculum components designed to promote person-centered leadership. Experts reached a consensus of at least 70% for all components, with most reaching over 80%. These components are meant to ensure leaders focus on the individual needs of those they serve.

How is this training delivered to new leaders?

The study identified 6 specific pedagogical delivery principles. These are the methods used to teach and deliver the curriculum effectively. Experts agreed on these principles to ensure that leadership programs remain consistent and high-quality across different organizations.

Does this training improve patient outcomes?

This study did not measure clinical outcomes or how much the curriculum improves patient results. Instead, it focused on creating a standard framework so that future studies can accurately measure the impact of these leadership programs.

Study Details

Study typeGuideline
EvidenceLevel 5
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
The creation of person-centred cultures in health care settings is understood as a pre requisite to the provision of person-centred practice. Such cultures need systematic facilitation by health care leaders. While there are few empirically informed theoretical models for person-centred leadership and many organisations internationally, educate leaders in how to transform cultures to become more person-centred, there is lack of consensus on how person-centred leadership can be developed and no high quality, multi-centre evaluations of their effectiveness or impact. Before such evaluations can be undertaken an agreed curriculum is necessary. Only by having this can the fidelity of a leadership programme, subject to evaluation, be maintained. This study sought to gain international expert consensus on a curriculum for person-centred leadership using a modified Delphi method. Delphi studies employ anonymous and confidential survey methods to ensure expert consensus can be achieved without the interference of influential voices or group coalitions. They typically include two or more rounds with controlled feedback between rounds. We developed curriculum components by undertaking a literature review to identify programmes and theoretical models for person-centred leadership alongside a mapping of current person-centred leadership programmes being delivered by members of an international community of practice committed to the development of person-centred practice. We recruited experts using snowball recruitment. In round 1 we focused on seeking consensus on 16 curriculum components and 6 pedagogical delivery principles and offered the opportunity to comment on the phrasing or clarity of any components or propose additional components. Round 1 resulted in consensus of ≥70% for all components. All bar one had consensus of ≥80%. In round 2 consensus was achieved for all components (≥80% and a mode of 5). Using a modified Delphi study approach we have developed an internationally critiqued curriculum framework for person- centred leadership programmes, specific enough to ensure the fidelity of future programme delivery whilst providing sufficient flexibility for appropriate cultural modification within any complex intervention evaluation study. Research is now needed to evaluate the impact of engagement with this curriculum on healthcare leaders’ self-views; enacted leadership behaviours and practices; health care cultures and other relevant patient and staff outcomes.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.